Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL

The basic issue in Iraq today is that the guy who was most effective at dealing with insurgent groups like ISIS was Saddam Hussein, not George W. Bush.


19 posted on 06/13/2014 4:09:21 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

“The basic issue in Iraq today is that the guy who was most effective at dealing with insurgent groups like ISIS was Saddam Hussein, not George W. Bush.”

For sure...but he also was serious about building up WMDs. In fact, he’d be alive and in power, except for those WMDs.

The problem was, I think, that we, for some crazy reason, thought he could be replaced with a functioning democracy. We needed to install his clone...or even re-install him, after taking the country and making sure it was clean WMD-wise.

We seemed to understand that during the Cold War. Ferdinand Marcos may have been a bastard when he ran the Philippines, but he was OUR BASTARD. But now we forget and seem to go back to a Jimmy Carter viewpoint...if the person isn’t perfect (like the Shah), then dump him and who cares what comes next.


20 posted on 06/13/2014 4:20:27 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson