To: SoConPubbie; Walrus; All
I think that Republicans having control of the House and Senate is more important than “losing with honor.”
To: EveningStar
Would you rather *lose* the election?
"Winning" the election with candidates like Boner, Cantor, Linda Graham, McLame, Cornan etc. IS losing the election.
39 posted on
06/11/2014 2:30:59 PM PDT by
867V309
(Don't tread on me, bro)
To: EveningStar
Well then what do they do with control? In the house? Not a damn thing but attack conservatives, stall investigations and work to assist and protect Obama/his agenda.
Shove the RINO crap ES. Winning with no honor is far worse when it aids Democrats. And the facts in evidence show that it does.
It’s funny that when a conservative gains traction here, Palin, you lead the charge to minimize her. When a Rino gets waxed, here you are working to push the lesser evil meme that caused our current situation to make up for it.
There is a reason JR once tagged you a troll.
41 posted on
06/11/2014 2:54:00 PM PDT by
Norm Lenhart
(How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
To: EveningStar
I think that Republicans having control of the House and Senate is more important than losing with honor.
I'm sure you do, but it is that mindset that keeps the GOP-E in control.
And with the GOP-E continually drifting leftward, and hell-bent on destroying our country by granting Amnesty, tell me again what value it will be to have a GOP-E controlled congress vs. a conservative controlled congress?
46 posted on
06/11/2014 3:28:14 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson