Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KarlInOhio
If he is found guilty in a court martial for desertion

That would be tricky. I'd think he was a deserter or AWOL until he was captured. Then his status became POW.

I don't like it at all. But to use a phrase from a Dylan song he was only "a pawn in their game".

17 posted on 06/10/2014 8:16:49 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: grania
That would be tricky. I'd think he was a deserter or AWOL until he was captured. Then his status became POW.

He was indeed a deserter but the term is "UA" for 'Unauthorized Absence', no longer AWOL as in 'Absent Without Leave'. His 'capture' is irrelevant as he was not captured on the battlefield or at his appointed place of duty. As a deserter he is no longer a representative of the United States Armed services and not provided protections under the Geneva Conventions. He cannot be placed in POW status for 2 reasons, 1-Desertion 2-the Taliban are not signators under the Geneva Conventions and are not a uniformed service.

19 posted on 06/10/2014 8:23:29 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: grania

I had thought I read that several years ago, a military investigation concluded that he was NOT a POW, or maybe I’m recalling what I read incorrectly.


30 posted on 06/10/2014 8:46:05 AM PDT by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson