To: Resettozero
I am damn tired of idiots that cannot understand the difference between the lesser of the two evils. Try this if one can. Would you rather have King Obama or Romney. Is that simple enough. Weigh the difference, tho not perfect but if the voters selected Romney as the Republican candidate then it was our responsibility to support. Some ass hats did all they could even after we now had a limited choice, still, like a communists Democrat, they tried to shoot him down. You got what you have now so bath in all the glory of King Obama. MILLIONS OF AMERICANS FORGOT HOW TO THINK.
To: Logical me
I am damned tired of idiots who cannot understand the concept of minimum standards.
Like you, for instance.
There were people in the R party who stated very clearly they would not vote for Romney, for a variety of valid reasons, during the primaries. Romney won the nomination, with a lot of backing by the R establishment. They then “called the bluff” of those who stated they could not vote for Romney.
Those folks weren’t bluffing.
And yet you decide its the people who warned the R party what would happen in Romney was the nominee that are to blame for his loss?
Laughable, and exceedingly stupid, as an opinion.
57 posted on
06/08/2014 11:23:05 AM PDT by
MortMan
("Homeland" may be a documentary.)
To: Resettozero; Logical me
The time for political campaigning is over by election day and one has two choices.
Refusing to vote for the lesser of two evils, by definition, supports greater evil.
62 posted on
06/08/2014 11:32:48 AM PDT by
frog in a pot
(The 2dA didn't grant a right - it preserved an existing right & was required to obtain ratification.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson