[P-Marlowe]

Is the law that makes it illegal to pay ransoms with taxpayer money to terrorist organizations also “unconstitutional”?

Obozo is trying to pretend that this was just a “prisoner exchange” but the facts are coming out that this was a monetary exchange.

But then we have a dictator instead of a president, so it won’t matter at all.

Obozo could order a nuclear strike against New York City and he’d still have a 60% approval rating with the survivors.

[CitizenUSA]

A law against paying bribes to terrorists seems constitutional to me, as Congress gets to determine how money is spent. If President Obama bribed the terrorists, that seems like an impeachable offense. Of course, nothing contrary to this regime is going to make it through Senator Reid. Impeachment is, unfortunately, not an option.

[InterceptPoint]

Obozo is trying to pretend that this was just a “prisoner exchange” but the facts are coming out that this was a monetary exchange.

There is no actual proof of this yet but the circumstantial evidence for it is overwhelming. I think the truth of this conjecture will come out and will show that money did change hands. If so, it will be yet another nail in the Obama Administration coffin.

[353FMG]

Then hopefully he will send another strike.

[Delta Dawn]

Obozo could order a nuclear strike against New York City

Would we be able to tell?