Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sunmars

One other fly in this anal sphincter ointment. They already have acknowledged that congress knew of and turned down the trade some five years ago. Scratch any credibility for this one. NEXT EXCUSE!


84 posted on 06/05/2014 10:26:27 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RJS1950
One other fly in this anal sphincter ointment. They already have acknowledged that congress knew of and turned down the trade some five years ago. Scratch any credibility for this one. NEXT EXCUSE NEXT LIE! I had to fix my mistake
99 posted on 06/05/2014 10:31:36 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: RJS1950

Oh, but the reason is that his health was deteriorating so badly that he would have DIED if he didn’t get released right away! Isn’t that what they were saying yesterday or the day before?

Bergdahl was already safe in US custody so there would have been no reason for them to lie about that - no reason for them not to just say that the Taliban had said they would kill him if they didn’t do the swap. So if the threat to kill him was what made things so urgent, then why did they lie and say his health was deteriorating?

Did they threaten Obama with some other bad thing if the regime didn’t LIE to America about what really happened? How many threats are these terrorists able to make against Obama? How many times has Obama lied to America because terrorists are pulling his strings, threatening something bad if he doesn’t lie to us? If this story about threats to kill Bergdahl are true, these are the questions Americans should be asking as a BEST-CASE scenario for why Obama may have lied to us about the Bergdahl swap, let alone all the other times he’s lied to us.

Given that Obama is a total fraud, it’s a question Americans should have been asking all along. Even if Obama himself isn’t on the side of the terrorists, what would keep the terrorists from being able to threaten him into doing whatever they told him to do? It’s DANGEROUS to have a puppet for a Commander-in-Chief.


191 posted on 06/05/2014 12:22:38 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson