Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
is it better for the state that those relationships be brief, brutish and meaningless or committed, affectionate and long-lasting?

The problem is that changing the meaning of words will not make the homosexual encounters anything BUT brief, brutish and meaningless.

Their encounters are based in the desire to stick their peepee into another guys butt. That is it. That is all there is to that "relationship". It is like asking if it is best for the state that the relationship between a person and their blowup doll be "committed, affectionate and long-lasting".

When everything is based on sex there is nothing there to build on.

There is no desire to have children together because they can't.

There is no desire to build a family together because they can not.

If you don't believe me just look at how many of those "committed, affectionate and long-lasting" relationships survived their make-believe "marriage".

41 posted on 06/03/2014 11:46:04 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Well said!


42 posted on 06/03/2014 2:32:44 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson