Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl go AWOL in Afghanistan?
CS Monitor ^ | 06/01/2014 | By Brad Knickerbocker

Posted on 06/01/2014 12:21:14 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

After five years as a POW, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is headed home. But the circumstances of his capture by the Taliban in Afghanistan remain unclear, indicating he may have walked away from his base.

For now, the story for US Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is one of physical and mental recovery and reunion with his family.

But very soon it will involve debriefings about the nearly five years of his captivity by Taliban fighters, who apparently held him in Pakistan as well as Afghanistan, where his infantry unit had been engaged in combat.

Military and intelligence experts will want to know how he was treated, anything he can tell them about his captors, and what he learned about insurgent capabilities.

But for the young soldier – 23 when he became a prisoner of war, now 28 – those debriefings also will include difficult questions about how and why he happened to be in a position where he fell into the hands of Taliban fighters.

There have been no reports that he was captured during direct combat, that the “fog of war” had put him involuntarily in a vulnerable location.

At this point in the developing narrative, Sgt. Bergdahl seems to have grown disillusioned with the mission, bitter about the Army and especially higher ranking enlisted men and officers, and simply walked off – gone “outside the wire” or protective base limits – and disappeared.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; afhanistan; aidandcomfort; awol; bergdahl; bobbergdahl; bowebergdahl; deserter; gitmo; missing; oef; taliban; usefulidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-177 next last
To: mgist

He cleaned up his act a little today. Obama must have told him he looked too much like a muzzie.


81 posted on 06/01/2014 1:18:51 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Note how Robert Bergdahl ends his tweet.

http://islam.about.com/od/prayer/f/Ending-Islamic-Prayers-With-Ameen.htm

Ameen!
Why do we say “Ameen” during prayers?

By Huda
Question: Why do we say “Ameen” during prayers?
In the Islam Forum, aspar asks: Why do Muslims end prayers with “Ameen” and Christians with “Amen?” Where did these words come from and what do they mean?
Answer: Amen (also pronounced Ahmen, Aymen, Ameen or Amin) is a word which is used in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam to express agreement with God’s truth. It is believed to have originated from an ancient Semitic word consisting of three consonants: A-M-N. In both Hebrew and Arabic, this root word means truthful, firm, and faithful. Common English translations include “verily,” “truly,” “it is so,” or “I affirm God’s truth.”

This word is used in Judaism and Christianity as an ending word for prayers and hymns. When saying “amen,” worshippers confirm their belief in God’s word, or affirm agreement with what is being preached or recited.

In Islam, the pronuciation “ameen” is often recited during daily prayers at the end of Surah Al-Fatihah (the first chapter of the Qur’an). It is also said during and at the end of personal supplications (du’a).

Any use of ameen in Islamic prayer is considered optional (sunnah), not required (wajib). The practice is based on the example and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. He reportedly told his followers to say ‘ameen’ after the imam (prayer leader) finishes reciting the Fatiha because: “If a person’s saying ‘ameen’ at that time coincides with the angels saying ‘ameen’, his previous sins will be forgiven.”

There is some difference of opinion among Muslims about whether “ameen” should be said during prayer in a quiet voice or a loud voice. Very few debate about whether it should be said at all; its use is widespread among Muslims.


82 posted on 06/01/2014 1:19:11 PM PDT by COUNTrecount (There's no there there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; maggief; montag813; hoosiermama; LucyT; WildHighlander57; don-o; Jet Jaguar; Nachum

Any chance the people below in the justice dept. had any influence in the release.

Up is down, traders are heroes, the justice dept. is not just.

DOJ Lawyers Who Represented Terrorism Suspects Detainees Are Identified
Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
Fox News has identified the seven anonymous Justice Department lawyers who previously represented Guantánamo detainees or terrorism suspects.
Justice Department spokesman Matthew A. Miller confirmed the names to Fox News’ Mike Levine, but did not say whether any of the seven previously anonymous lawyers now work on issues related to Guantánamo detainees.
“Each of the nine people referenced in the letter filed legal briefs that are available by using something as simple as Google,” Miller told Fox News. “We will not participate in an attempt to drag people’s names through the mud for political purposes.”
Miller said “politics has overtaken facts and reality” in the battle over the lawyers’ identities. (Full statement below)
The current Justice Department employees who previously represented Guantánamo detainees or terrorism suspects are:
· Tony West, the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division.
· Jonathan Cedarbaum, of the Office of Legal Counsel.
· Eric Columbus, senior counsel in the Office of the Deputy Attorney General.
· Karl Thompson, of the Office of Legal Counsel.
· Joseph Guerra, Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General.
· Tali Farhadian, an official in the Office of the Attorney General.
· Beth Brinkmann, Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Division.
Two other DOJ lawyers — Principal Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal and National Security Division Attorney Jennifer Daskal – also formerly represented detainees, but their identities had already been known.
In response to the DOJ confirmation, Keep America Safe spokesman Aaron Harison said the organization still wants information on which of the lawyers works on detainee issues within the DOJ.
“The American people have a right to know whether lawyers who voluntarily flocked to Guantanamo to take up the cause of the terrorists are currently working on detainee issues in President Obama’s Justice Department,” Harison said. (Full statement below)
Details about the DOJ lawyers’ involvement in Guantánamo detainee cases are available in the article, which also points out that the Justice Department hired several lawyers who represented Guantánamo detainees during the George W.

Holder’s former firm, Covington & Burling represented 14 Gitmo detainees. Still looking to see which ones:
“Guantanamo Bay Detainees
We currently represent fourteen men detained at the United States Naval Station at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Most of the men have been detained for approximately eight years and none have been charged with any crimes. Following the decision by the Supreme Court in Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), holding that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus extends to detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, we are challenging the legality of our clients’ detentions in habeas proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Of the seven cases that have gone to merits hearings thus far, Covington has won four, lost two, and is awaiting a decision in one other. Two prior clients were released without a hearing.
The firm has been involved in the Guantánamo related litigation for the last six years. In addition to the on-going habeas corpus proceedings, our efforts have included: bringing cases for review of enemy combatant classification decisions in the D.C. Circuit under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005; challenging the destruction of CIA torture tapes in federal court; filing amicus briefs and coordinating the amicus effort in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006); filing amicus briefs in support of Supreme Court review in Moussaoui v. United States, 382 F.3d 483 (4th Cir.), cert denied, 544 U.S. 931 (2005); challenging the government’s practice of redacting information from documents given to security-cleared habeas counsel; and challenging the abusive medical and living conditions that the detainees experience at Guantánamo.”
http://www.cov.com/probonooverview/probono.aspx?show=morehighlights
I believe the CCR represented him. The CCR has strong ties to Covington & Burling:
“And then there is the Center for Constitutional Rights, a Marxist organization that for years has coordinated legal representation for terrorists detained at Guantanamo Bay. The CCR has been attempting to convince Germany, France, Spain, and other countries to file war-crime indictments against former Bush administration officials, including President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and Secretary Rumsfeld. In representing America’s enemies, CCR has collaborated with many private lawyers, who also volunteered their services — several of whom are now working in the Obama Justice Department. Indeed, Holder’s former firm boasts that it still represents 16 Gitmo detainees (the number was previously higher). And, for help shaping detainee policy, Holder recently hired Jennifer Daskal for DOJ’s National Security Division — a lawyer from Human Rights Watch with no prior prosecutorial experience, whose main qualification seems to be the startling advocacy she has done for enemy combatants

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228146/eric-holders-hidden-agenda/andrew-c-mccarthy
Jennifer Daskal
Jennifer Daskal is an American lawyer who serves as senior counsel for Human Rights Watch, and focuses on issues of terrorism, criminal law and immigration.[1][2] She is also currently a political hire at the Department of Justice, which is seeking to prosecute terror suspects through the criminal justice system instead of through military tribunals.[3][4]
A graduate of Harvard Law School, Cambridge and Brown University and a Marshall Scholar,[5] Daskal garnered attention after traveling to the countries to which Guantanamo captives have been released, to verify that those countries are abiding by the undertakings they made to the US Government to respect the returned captives’ human rights.[6]
On February 23, 2010, the New York Post reported that Daskal, Neal Katyal, and three other lawyers who had worked on behalf of the civil rights of Guantanamo captives, had been serving on the Obama administration’s task force reviewing the status of the remaining Guantanamo captives.[7] The paper had first questioned her appointment to the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, in July 2009, and then again in January 2010


83 posted on 06/01/2014 1:21:17 PM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Check this out

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/06/143437-american-soldier-served-bowe-bergdahl-casts-doubt-official-story-fears-reprisal-obama-administration/


84 posted on 06/01/2014 1:23:42 PM PDT by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I have a bad feeling in the pit of my stomach that we will hear very little that is negative about Bergdahl on TV. Not even Fox News.

Of course not. He is the posterboy of the new US global military.

All military and all conservatives are supposed to jump in line and cheer.
85 posted on 06/01/2014 1:24:21 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AU72

I wish I had seen that movie & show - but I haven’t.
Personally - I see great potential for a future Secretary of State, no?


86 posted on 06/01/2014 1:25:22 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

2 that are brave enough to openly say so.
Which means there are probably a great number out there who know what the deal is


87 posted on 06/01/2014 1:27:13 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: boop

According to soldiers who served with him, Taliban attacks increased in scope and accuracy in the weeks following Bergdahl’s departure. Just like they had someone who could give them additional insights on our tactics and vulnerabilities. As a PFC (at the time) Bergdahl wasn’t in a position to have sensitive intel information, but he could certainly give the Taliban pointers on how to make their attacks against our troops more deadly.

At least six soldiers died on missions aimed at finding Bergdahl. When he walked away from his post, he knew our forces would come looking for him. The blood of those brave men is on his hands. But it looks like Hobama will roll out the red carpet when they bring him home.


88 posted on 06/01/2014 1:27:30 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Tapper was conversing with the one Twitter account last night


89 posted on 06/01/2014 1:28:24 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Re: “I know this sounds like quibbling, but why isn’t Obama wearing a tie?”

It's not quibbling, Steve.

It's racist!

90 posted on 06/01/2014 1:30:36 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Caffeine sounds way better to me than Freud.

Ha!


91 posted on 06/01/2014 1:31:27 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Many Muslim leaders do not wear ties


92 posted on 06/01/2014 1:31:43 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Benghazi)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/06/143437-american-soldier-served-bowe-bergdahl-casts-doubt-official-story-fears-reprisal-obama-administration/

American Soldier Who Served With Freed POW Casts Doubt on Official Story; Fears Reprisal From Obama Administration

EEarly Saturday it was announced by the administration that the only American prisoner of war in Afghanistan was released in exchange for 5 Guantanamo Bay terrorists being set free to Qatar. [Explicit language below.]
The circumstances of the capture of Bowe Bergdahl had been in question long before his release – supposedly he had wandered off and captured by the Taliban.
But a soldier on Twitter is claiming that the official story is untrue, and has posted his version of the events that led to Bowe’s capture as I originally posted on my blog.
Towards the end of his story, he says he fears reprisal from the Obama administration, and asks for legal help. It must be noted also that he has a avatar that bears a picture of Bowe with the word “traitor” posted over it.
After stating that “F[***] what you I heard. I was there.,” here are the tweets telling his version of the story so far:


93 posted on 06/01/2014 1:32:08 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Let’s see how courageous Roger Ailes is in reporting this story about treason and deceit, in order to get Taliban leaders out of Gitmo and get the VA scandal off the front page, a win-win for this cunning president. Follow this nasty story to the end and there will be the news story of the decade.


94 posted on 06/01/2014 1:33:24 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I'm guessing here that Obama never saw the movie:


95 posted on 06/01/2014 1:34:17 PM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

i wish someone would make a gif showing the expression on obozo’s face when the dad starts speaking pashtu


96 posted on 06/01/2014 1:36:55 PM PDT by Selene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid

Yeah, I was reading Cody’s Twitter feed. Good post!


97 posted on 06/01/2014 1:37:56 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

We can hope!


98 posted on 06/01/2014 1:41:05 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

I’ve been sharing the hell out of that image on facebook. Unfortunately there are too many who agree with this bastard.


99 posted on 06/01/2014 1:43:02 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The guy is a Muzzie, this is unreal. And he’s a radical one to boot...Gee ya think he could have had any effect on his son? I would say the possibility that his son deserted to join the Taliban is quite high wouldn’t you say.


100 posted on 06/01/2014 1:43:34 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hitlery: Incarnation of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson