/johnny
1) I'm not a "GOP-E" type. If I was, I'd be backing incumbents like Thad Cochran instead of their opponents
2) I am also a staunch pro-life conservative and certainly DO NOT want the GOP to "compromise" on abortion. In fact, this is precisely why I've OPPOSED numerous "Tea Party" candidates who ARE willing to compromise on abortion, especially when they are running against a candidate who is a PROVEN strong pro-life candidate. For example, most of the Illinois "Tea Party" groups backed pro-abortion Bruce Rauner in the GOP over numerous pro-life candidates, and most of the national "Tea Party" groups backed Liz Cheney for the US Senate when she had never once supported pro-life causes before announcing her Senate campaign. Her opponent has a 30 year track record of standing up for life. One of the reason I am not a member of a "Tea Party" group is precisely BECAUSE they don't care about running socially conservative candidates.