[Flavious_Maximus]

New England is by far over represented in the Senate. Tiny Rhode Island, Connecticut and Massachusetts send six Bolshevik Senators between them. They are losing population to the southern states so why does NE get so much influence?

[skinkinthegrass]

C'mon now; You know why, If we had an honest, active engaged, freedom-loving mass
media, these B@$t@rds wouldn't see the inside lights of the Capitol Hill..but we don't,
do we? ..they're as corrupt; as the Establishment Party, they cover in Wash. DC.
Is it any wonder, we only get the truth about our Gov't. from the UK/Canada? We have
very few papers (Wash. Beacon/Times) who actually work on their own stories.
Most; If not all, rely on the DNC/Marxist sycophants @ the NYT (NY/Boston/Wash/
Chic./LA axis) posts, as their leads..no such thing "as freedom in the print" in the axis.

[Jacquerie]

Because the constitution specifically, directly acts on the states as states. If the constitution acted only on the people, there wouldn’t have been any need for state representation in the senate.