To: entropy12; ansel12
Illogical as always! You miss my point again!
Your original post entrophy12:
That includes Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. Because they are skilled politicians. Many really good conservative candidates have lost because they are not skilled politicians.
Ansel's response to you was completely correct.
Rand Paul with his support for GOP-E Leader McConnell over Tea-Party Bevin, His Amnesty Plan, his desire to de-emphasize the social issues, etc. means he is no longer a Tea-Party conservative, but has now joined the GOP-E.
As Ansel stated, Rand Paul doesn't belong in the same category as Ted Cruz. Rand Paul has compromised himself.
82 posted on
05/27/2014 10:48:36 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
That was not the point I was making.
Read my post again please.
To reiterate my point, good candidates can win in spite of GOPe support. Cruz and Paul both fit in that category. Both were opposed by GOPe.
My post had nothing to do with either support or rejection of Rand Paul. Get it? It is all about good candidates versus poor candidates.
84 posted on
05/27/2014 10:58:16 PM PDT by
entropy12
(Harry Reid will not allow debate on any good bills passed by House. GOP needs 51 senators in 2014!)
To: SoConPubbie; entropy12
We are seeing how the Paul gang are going to operate.
Avoid discussing Paul, and go after his critics.
85 posted on
05/28/2014 12:12:09 AM PDT by
ansel12
((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson