Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeshugeMikey

Liberals always love those with the blood of dead children on their hands.


21 posted on 05/27/2014 8:58:25 AM PDT by gura (If Allah is so great, why does he need fat sexually confused fanboys to do his dirty work? -iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gura

Rachel Carson’s movement, though a de facto genocide,

served the purpose of making 1st world liberals feel self-righteous,

so, in their minds, it was well worth the millions of “invisible” third world deaths to malaria.


22 posted on 05/27/2014 8:59:54 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: gura
*Liberals always love those with the blood of dead children on their hands.*

Yep. Stalin, Che, Mao, Castro. All the famous ones.
I wonder why they don't openly love Hitler?
Nazi stands for National SOCIALIST Workers Party.
Maybe he didn't kill enough children for their liking?
Maybe all they know from their Communist teaching in public schools was “Communism good, Hitler bad”

25 posted on 05/27/2014 10:41:59 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson