Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I really wish the truth about just how much environmental damage the construction and long-term operation of an electric car does versus that of a non-electric.

I bet good money that if you took an original '68 Mustang, back before catalytic converters and all the other pollution controls were slapped on cars, and compared it with an electric car over their entire lives -- I mean, from the materials being pulled out of the ground, through its construction, during its operation, to what is left behind to rot in a junkyard -- you'd find the old Mustang far, far less environmentally damaging than the electric car.


7 posted on 05/23/2014 7:04:01 AM PDT by caligatrux (...some animals are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: caligatrux
I bet good money that if you took an original '68 Mustang, back before catalytic converters and all the other pollution controls were slapped on cars, and compared it with an electric car over their entire lives -- I mean, from the materials being pulled out of the ground, through its construction, during its operation, to what is left behind to rot in a junkyard -- you'd find the old Mustang far, far less environmentally damaging than the electric car.

IIRC, the Mustang also sold a million copies in the '65-'66 period. Right now, GM is on track to hit that number of Volts (and Cadillac clones) in around seven hundred years. There will still be classic Mustangs running long after the last Volt bursts into flames.

Based on longevity alone, the Mustang wins the environmental impact contest.

25 posted on 05/23/2014 7:44:25 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson