Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caligatrux
I bet good money that if you took an original '68 Mustang, back before catalytic converters and all the other pollution controls were slapped on cars, and compared it with an electric car over their entire lives -- I mean, from the materials being pulled out of the ground, through its construction, during its operation, to what is left behind to rot in a junkyard -- you'd find the old Mustang far, far less environmentally damaging than the electric car.

IIRC, the Mustang also sold a million copies in the '65-'66 period. Right now, GM is on track to hit that number of Volts (and Cadillac clones) in around seven hundred years. There will still be classic Mustangs running long after the last Volt bursts into flames.

Based on longevity alone, the Mustang wins the environmental impact contest.

25 posted on 05/23/2014 7:44:25 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Martel
Based on longevity alone, the Mustang wins the environmental impact contest.

In addition, the 64 1/2 to 66 Mustangs have the 'it' factor that a modern Cadillac can't touch. Park a nicely maintained or restored original Mustang in a parking lot and almost everyone will give it a long once-over (and most guys will circle the car in admiration) while a new Cadillac won't elicit a second glance.

52 posted on 05/23/2014 10:30:09 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson