[kabar]

I don’t give a damn about his the state of his marriage with his invalid (Alzheimer’s) wife. Judging an old man in his unfortunate situation for seeking other female companionship is a needless distraction from the real issues of the campaign. It may even create sympathy for him.

Putting your mistress on the payroll and flying her around at taxpayer expense is more than just seeking female companionship. It should be a crime.

[Impy]

It’s probably the other way around, ie he began a relationship with his staffer, rather than making a previous mistress a staffer.

If it’s the latter and that can be proven, that might be an effective issue. Calling him adulterous scum for cheating on a wife that doesn’t remember him anymore won’t help though, at least I don’t think so.