Posted on 05/22/2014 7:11:31 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
Professors Byron Calhoun, of West Virginia University-Charlestons Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Teresa Collett, of the University of St. Thomas Law School, addressed concerns about womens health in abortion clinics on the one-year anniversary of the Kermit Gosnell court case.
Calhoun said, Unfortunately, the lack of oversight, regulation and accountability afforded to abortion clinics, abortion providers and the abortion industry remains an inexplicable medical anomaly. He went on, No other medical or service industry is allowed to act with such impunity or freedom from external peer review or administrative review. In his state of West Virginia, there is no oversight, no inspection by the state of abortion clinics. Yet, cosmetologists, tattoo parlors, vet clinics are under scrutiny and are regularly inspected by the state. It is for this reason that, as Calhoun said, Abortion industry providers love to tap the uniqueness of their care and industry.
As a 1992 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court said, abortion is the only care rendered which routinely ended in the death of a member of the human race. Calhoun pointed out the inconsistencies of the abortion industry, which, along with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, steadfastly refuses to admit to any complications to abortion. These parties refuse to admit the shortcomings of abortion clinic procedures as well as the abortion procedures themselves. Calhoun said, All other providers must have strict protocols in place and in other areas of medicine, malpractice would ensue if Gosnell-type conditions were discovered in non-abortion medical clinics. Yet, said Calhoun, The abortion industry howls with dismay at attempts to standardize and clean up abortion clinic standards.
Calhoun found over 140 papers demonstrating increased risk for pre-term birth after an abortion. Pre-term births, as Calhoun said, can result in a high chance of cerebral palsy or other disabilities. The risk of pre-term births has been shown to increase 35 to 64% for just a single abortion.
Additionally, Calhoun cited studies that showed an increased risk of mental health issues post-abortion. For example, he found one study that said, 81% of increased mental health problems in women post-abortion as well as 10% of mental health problems in women in general can be specifically attributed to abortion. Finland, in studies, discovered a three-to-four times increased risk for death after abortion because suicide rates were increased 50 to 600% of those who have abortion compared to giving birth.
These studies, said Calhoun, would seem credible enough to an individual, but that is not the case with the abortion industry. He and others felt, Holding the abortion industry and abortion providers to the minimum seems rational. He pushed for abortion clinics to adopt the same accepted guidelines and same accepted procedures as well as the same credentials, same training, same oversight that every other medical service provided in the United States.
Collett added to Calhouns remarks from a law professors perspective. She said the U.S. Supreme Court got increasingly radical after striking down a law requiring a second physician be present at an abortion for safety reasons, yet upheld a statistical reporting law in Pennsylvania. The inconsistency befuddles Collett, but overall, the Supreme Court has taken a dim view of reporting numbers of abortions the sort of normal health information that would be necessary in order to determine its public health impact. The highest court in the United States even carved out a unique role for minors to secretly bar their parents involvement in abortions through a secret court system. Collett called this the only proceeding outside of national security hearings where someone can lose constitutional rights without warning or knowledge.
Eventually, the Supreme Court required licensing and other requirements to ensure better regulations by the states. At one point, Pennsylvania had some of the most effectively operated and regulated clinics in the country before politics intervened.
The Gosnell clinic and their violations were only discovered after the state was investigating whether he was dealing illegal drugs. The Gosnell case, where graphic images and descriptions surfaced through testimonies, creates an impetus across the states to ensure better enforcement of health standards in abortion clinics.
Collett pointed out, RU486, the abortion pill, did not go through the normal vetting and testing and clinical trials that we see of other drugs. This leaves our women unprotected, she said. In Minnesota, a state that regulates hair braiding, a woman in labor could feasibly abort her child without legal consequence. Minnesota will not regulate doctors who are doing abortions and is misguided to push for access to abortions no matter how unsafe.
On the flip side, Texas is serious about protecting womens health with their current laws and regulations on the books. An all-woman panel said that, of course, the state of Texas had an adequate state interest with the recent passage of laws pushing for regulation of abortion clinics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.