[wolfpat]

My friend, Scott MacKenzie, posted this to his Facebook page. He sent me a cleaner version when I told him I wanted to share his research with a wider audience.

[FreedomPoster]

They have ballots and can actually audit a precinct? Beats the crappy system we have here in GA.

[Admin Moderator]

We ask that all published material include a working link.

If your friend is permitting Free Republic to host his article, and is willing to retract the following warning found on his Facebook page, please post that he has given you permission to share his Facebook article here on Free Republic and despite his published warning copied below:

About Scott

Photos, info on events, etc.:

*PRIVACY NOTICE:

Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/ or the comments made about my photos or any other "picture" art posted on my profile.

You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein.

The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control.

The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law.

It is recommended that other members post a similar notice to this or you may copy and paste this one. Thank you.

Please hit the abuse button when you have posted your response stating that you have received his permission to publicize and post his material here.

Thank you.

[Steven Scharf]

This appears to be an attempt to find a conspiracy where none exists.

The results of the absentees were showing as 100% because something was programed wrong. They fixed that glitch. It did not affect the actual returns that were in the process of being counted. The nice thing about having primaries is you can test equipment before the big show in November.

All of this is really moot as every jurisdiction and state reviews their data the next day or during sometime following an election and then certifies the results. Election night results always have the caveat that they are unofficial.

[mabarker1]

So now vote fraud is called a “glitch” ?

Thanks for posting and thank your friend for chasing this mess.