She is the world’s biggest enabler and opportunist.
Can you say “blowing” and “Clinton” in the same headline?
I remember at the time of her 2008 campaign, that polling showed Hillary had some of the highest negatives ever recorded for a major party presidential candidate.
Would any of that have changed? What’s changed since 2008? She served as Secretary of State. Did her performance as Secretary of State change any minds about her? Anybody?
I don’t know who could rise up, but, someone else on the Democrat side could take out Hillary, just as Obama did in ‘08. I think Hillary’s support is a mile wide and an inch deep.
I even hear that many Democrats are not exactly thrilled about the Clintons, because among other things, the Clintons aren’t liberal enough for them.
Well, you have to say one thing about Hillary, through all this litany of blunders, she has managed to retain her hubris unscathed.
Hillary Fired For “Lying, Unethical Behavior” on Watergate Committee
Hillary Clinton might have a pretty hefty scandal brewing. It turns when she was an attorney working on the Watergate investigation, she was fired by her supervisor for “lying, unethical behavior.”
Jerry Zeifman, who said he is a lifelong Democrat, was a supervisor for 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. When the investigation was complete, Zeifman said he fired Hillary and refused to give her a recommendation. “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.
Dan Calabrese reports: How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.
Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.
The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel.
Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception. The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970.
“As soon as the impeachment resolutions were introduced by (then-House Minority Leader Gerald) Ford, and they were referred to the House Judiciary Committee, the first thing Douglas did was hire himself a lawyer,” Zeifman said. The Judiciary Committee allowed Douglas to keep counsel, thus establishing the precedent. Zeifman says he told Hillary that all the documents establishing this fact were in the Judiciary Committee’s public files. So what did Hillary do?
“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.
The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge. Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.
Of course, Nixon’s resignation rendered the entire issue moot, ending Hillary’s career on the Judiciary Committee staff in a most undistinguished manner. Zeifman says he was urged by top committee members to keep a diary of everything that was happening. He did so, and still has the diary if anyone wants to check the veracity of his story. Certainly, he could not have known in 1974 that diary entries about a young lawyer named Hillary Rodham would be of interest to anyone 34 years later.
Talk about a foreign policy nightmare! Can anyone say, "traitorously sending gifts to Al Qaeda"?
HF
Remember when she would cover up her husband’s rapes and now bj is trying to help her cover up the rape of Stevens. Awe they do love each other.
nobody ever even mentions the waco massacre and the alinski thesis...well...maybe not so amazing...or, as the herd says now...”not so much”...
awesome...
Dick G:AMERICAN !!!!!
Semper Watching
*****
That’s the best article on Hillary I’ve ever read. Succinct and entertaining, it makes it’s points and hits the important ones.
Very nicely done.
Were she a Republican, she would have never risen above a county or municipal level of public service. That she was a Senator and Sec State is an indictment of the liberal media running cover for her.
Her tripping and falling and drinking should give Chevy Chase another career boost.
Littered with mind-blowing errors that covers her and her entire party.
Another one: “Who painted it?” referring to the miraculous tilma of St. Juan Diego on which Our Lady of Guadalupe appeared.
Too BIG to fail?
I would say Obungler is the world’s biggest bungler. Hillary is an epic bungler but she is a piker compared to Bathhouse Barry
Zero accomplishments. Even a most loyal supporter was unable to list any. And yes, her health does matter, as it does for anyone wanting to be president.
She really is an imbecile and incompetent. She did NOTHING! in the US Senate and as Secretary of State. Though I give her high-IQ rating when it comes to political scheming