Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Wrong. Exactly 50% of the population is above the median IQ. It's entirely possible for more than 50% of a sample to be either above or below the average value of any metric you choose to apply. For example, the average of 3,3,3,1 is 2.5. 75% of the set is above average.
92 posted on 05/15/2014 4:51:42 AM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Jack of all Trades

Sorry. You’re entirely correct for a small group, or when speaking of statistics in general. In this particular case, the IQ scale was specifically designed so that 50% of the population was above the mean as well as the median.

Where the mean and median fall within subgroups of the population may of course vary significantly.


95 posted on 05/15/2014 5:49:31 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Jack of all Trades

BTW, the term “average” may refer to the median, the mode, or most commonly, the mean, which is apparently what you assume is the only meaning of the term.

You are, of course, quite correct that for many data sets these can be very different values. That which use of the term is meant is not commonly stated is one of the most significant failure of popular writing about statistics.


96 posted on 05/15/2014 10:49:29 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson