Yes, but
What Difference Does It Make?
I never understand this debate about voter ID.
In a world in which you need an ID to get on an airplane, enter a federal building, and to conduct various business transactions, why would that same reasoning not apply to voting????
And, the liberals act as if the Supreme Court didn’t rule that voter ID laws are constitutional. Instead, they continue to bring court cases on these laws in various states, and in some states, liberal judged have set aside voter ID laws, in defiance of the Supreme Court ruling on the subject.
How lower court judges can overturn voter ID laws when the Supreme Court has already ruled on the issue is beyond my pay grade. Has anyone else noticed that? And can anyone explain any legitimate legal reasoning behind this?
There isn't any. This is a blatant move to ensure vote fraud (and voter disenfranchisement) remain SOP.
Not to mention, I’m pretty sure one needs a government ID to sign up for and receive “benes” (welfare).
Funny how no one seems to have a problem finding an ID for that.
Yes, but
What Difference Does It Make?