[napscoordinator]

Walker/Pence 2016......a winning ticket. If Palin wants in that is fine too. But 100 percent NO to Cruz and Paul. They would be the biggest disaster.....can you imagine a first term Senator (2 years in for Cruz) going up against Hillary. She would eat him for lunch due to his inexperience. He is 43 (this year).....he can run in 2034.

[spiderfern]

I agree Walker may be the best candidate....very thick skinned too. Wonder if he has a good sense of humor to laugh off the smut that will be thrown at him?

[for-q-clinton]

Uh Obama beat Hillary with no experience.

[plain talk]

can you imagine a first term Senator (2 years in for Cruz) going up against Hillary.

You mean like Obama? Obama was a one-term Senators for just a few years and not only beat Hillary but got elected President twice.

[ilgipper]

I beg to differ on Cruz. His only downside I see is whether he has the charisma for the race, but he’s got a lot more than Hillary, and he is much quicker than her on the fly.

Experience means as much in a presidential campaign now as military experience, which is none. It’s about campaign execution and performance.

I would be very happy with Pence or Walker, or a combination. Both guys are solid. I might go with either in the race. I just don’t and won’t discount Cruz.

[2ndDivisionVet]

President Abraham Lincoln was a one-term-and-out congressman. Never a governor, senator, flag officer or cabinet secretary. Hillary Clinton would not eat Ted Cruz for lunch. Do you realize that Senator Cruz was the North American debating champion, both as an individual and as part of a two-man team? Referring to Cruz's time as a student at Harvard Law, Professor Alan Dershowitz said, "Cruz was off-the-charts brilliant."

In the landmark case of District of Columbia v. Heller, Cruz drafted the amicus brief signed by attorneys general of 31 states, which said that the D.C. handgun ban should be struck down as infringing upon the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Cruz also presented oral argument for the amici states in the companion case to Heller before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

[matthew fuller]

No way hillary eats Cruz’es lunch- he can take care of himself. Didn’t she already get her big butt smacked down by a first-term senator?

[bramps]

‘Hillary Clinton would eat Ted Cruz for lunch’...a definite contender for most moronic post of the year.

[Fledermaus]

Yeah, she really ate Obama for lunch...a 2 year first term Senator with zero experience.

[Alter Kaker]

.can you imagine a first term Senator (2 years in for Cruz) going up against Hillary. She would eat him for lunch due to his inexperience.

I seem to remember people saying the same thing about the last first term Senator to run against Hillary for President...

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

Are you kidding me and everyone on this website? Cruz would mop the floor with her.Experience? What the hell did she have?A joke of a term as secstate and carpet bagger senator of new York?What a laugh.Remember hillarycare?Sounds a lot like ole barrycare.Thats an anvil around every demorats neck and you should know that.

[Freeping Since 2001]

..can you imagine a first term Senator (2 years in for Cruz) going up against Hillary. She would eat him for lunch due to his inexperience.

---

I guess you missed him mopping the floor with Dianne Feinswine, and looking like a gentleman in the process:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bzb9Hs2SmfQ

Frankly, I think Cruz can out-Reagan even Reagan. And he can outsmart ANYONE in Washington DC of either party.

[wardaddy]

Damn

You are strange