Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tcrlaf
So, in your opinion, invading another country with agents provocateur, special forces, and stuffing ballot boxes during a "referendum" which you use as a pretext for a military invasion is actually less threatening than shuffling some missiles around when The NeoSoviet® Empire has plenty of missiles that can hit Europe where they already are.

No wonder you post all this piffle. You haven't the sense that God gave lettuce.

14 posted on 05/08/2014 2:30:42 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

Can you make an any more circular argument, that still means nothing? It says a lot that you miss the entire point of the article.

What does “invading another country” have to do with move/countermove international diplomacy?

I’ll hold my breath waiting for a LOGICAL answer. (Not so much...)


16 posted on 05/08/2014 2:35:29 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson