To: Democrat_media
I agree that the percentage audited is far too high, given the known political affiliations of these donor/taxpayers. But some of them are going to be prime candidates for audit anyway, just because their AGI falls above a certain level. Many of these taxpayers will be successful self-employed professionals who might be inclined to gravitate toward the Tea Party.
Not every candidate for audit is "randomly" selected, and it is an error in judgment to believe otherwise.
35 posted on
05/08/2014 8:14:38 AM PDT by
Milton Miteybad
(I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
To: Milton Miteybad
bs the IRS is supposed to look at the whole population and then from that determine who to audit . and you say they did that . bs. then by sheer coincidence the audited end up on the same lists the IRS obtained from the tea party groups the IRS was already oppressing . no way that 10% audited from the general population end up on the same small lists of groups the IRS was ALREADY oppressing and harassing with books of questions. and you defend this tyranny. the IRS audited them because they were on those lists of tea party groups
these were 3 small lists . IRS audits 10% on those lists
The only common denominator was they were on those lists. what other criteria can you prove that caused them to be audited . you can't and are just defending tyranny
40 posted on
05/08/2014 8:26:53 AM PDT by
Democrat_media
(Obama ordered IRS to rig 2012 election and must resign)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson