[Democrat_media]

bs the IRS is supposed to look at the whole population and then from that determine who to audit . and you say they did that . bs. then by sheer coincidence the audited end up on the same lists the IRS obtained from the tea party groups the IRS was already oppressing . no way that 10% audited from the general population end up on the same small lists of groups the IRS was ALREADY oppressing and harassing with books of questions. and you defend this tyranny. the IRS audited them because they were on those lists of tea party groups

these were 3 small lists . IRS audits 10% on those lists

The only common denominator was they were on those lists. what other criteria can you prove that caused them to be audited . you can't and are just defending tyranny

[Milton Miteybad]

"Defending tyranny?" Please. You're taking yourself and your questionable understanding of the facts far too seriously here.

I'm correctly pointing out, as others have, that some of these people would fall within well-established criteria for audit anyway. Would 10% so qualify under said guidelines? No, and we agree on that. But some of these people are likely to have been audited in any event, although it would probably be 1/4 to 1/3 of the number actually audited.