Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Lesbian Women ‘Marry’ Each Other, Claim to Be World’s First ‘Throuple’
Christian News Network ^ | May 5, 2014

Posted on 05/06/2014 2:41:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

MASSACHUSETTS – Three women in Massachusetts claim they are the world’s first lesbian ‘throuple,’ after they all exchanged wedding vows and ‘married’ each other last year.

Brynn, Doll, and Kitten are three women who range in age from 27 to 34. Last August, they organized a wedding-style ceremony, in which they entered into a threesome “marriage” union.

Even though Massachusetts recognizes same-sex “marriages,” polygamy is illegal. However, that did not deter Brynn, Doll, and Kitten from entering into a three-way relationship.

“In our eyes we are married,” Brynn told The Sun newspaper. “We had specialist lawyers draw up paperwork so our assets are equally divided.”

The three women recognized that their union is possibly unprecedented.

“As far as we know, there aren’t any other three women who are married like us,” Doll told the Daily Mail.

Doll says she has considered herself to be polygamous since high school.

“I had always dated girls, who—although they had boyfriends or girlfriends—were also allowed to date me,” she stated. “I never thought that much about it and I had never really come out as poly to my friends and family. To me, it was just how I was.”

Brynn describes their relationship as a “romantic committee,” where the household responsibilities are allocated between the three of them. Nevertheless, she says that she and her two partners are “very traditional people” and “perfectly normal.”

“Doll, Kitten, and I may not be the norm but we are perfectly normal,” she claims. “We are simply people trying to live the life that we feel is best for us and we deserve the rights afforded to others.”

According to the three women, they would like to raise children by using anonymous sperm donors. They say they want three children—one for each of them.

“We always joke that the children should never outnumber the parents,” Brynn says.

Massachusetts officials say they will not reprimand the three women for their polygamous relationship.

As previously reported, non-traditional marriage and parenting structures are becoming increasingly common, with contract-based “co-parenting” especially on the rise. Late last year, a federal judge struck down part of Utah’s polygamy ban as unconstitutional.

Experts have long warned of the societal consequences of non-Biblical “marriage” models. In an article published last December, Ken Klukowski of the Center for Religious Liberty explains that the legalization of homosexuality opens the door to polygamy.

“If government cannot forbid homosexual conduct, this argument goes, then neither can it deny those who define themselves by homosexual behavior to officially recognize any such relationship as a marriage,” Klukowski wrote. “It began a religious and philosophical debate in America between two different definitions of marriage and family.”

“The new conception of marriage, rooted in the proliferation of no-fault divorce laws in the 1970s and the sexual revolution, is that marriage is about personal happiness and fulfillment,” he continued. “People should be free to form whatever relationships they find personally satisfying and to follow whatever their personal sexual inclinations are to engage in whatever form of sexual behavior they find gratifying.”

“If, therefore, you have a right to officially recognize those homosexual relationships through redefining marriage to include same-sex couples, then there is no reason to say it cannot include more than two people, so long as everyone is a consenting adult,” Klukowski proposed. “The exact legal arguments for same-sex marriage equally apply to multiple-person marriages.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lesbianism; massachusetts; polygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

No telling.


41 posted on 05/06/2014 3:35:19 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“We had specialist lawyers draw up paperwork so our asses are equally divided.”

Sorry I couldn’t resist!


42 posted on 05/06/2014 3:36:21 PM PDT by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

The Witches of Eastwick?


43 posted on 05/06/2014 3:37:59 PM PDT by ABN 505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

That one in the middle though ;^)


44 posted on 05/06/2014 3:43:18 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They think they are a First??? Guess they have not been to Utah. Maybe they should turn on their TV and watch the show about the Mormon guy with the 5 wives.


45 posted on 05/06/2014 3:45:54 PM PDT by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Thruple?

Rien de nouveau.


46 posted on 05/06/2014 3:47:24 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What a touching love story. It sure warms the cockles of your heart!

Is this known as a "Lesbian sandwich"? Which lucky bride gets the middle on their blessed wedding night?

47 posted on 05/06/2014 3:50:17 PM PDT by Gritty (Gun controllers aren't afraid of guns but a country where the individual has power-Dan Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CdMGuy
They think they are a First??? Guess they have not been to Utah. Maybe they should turn on their TV and watch the show about the Mormon guy with the 5 wives.

In that case, though, the "wives" are individually "married" to the man, they aren't all claiming to be "married" to each other, are they?

48 posted on 05/06/2014 4:04:58 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Now for the dash to be the first to marry (1) what and (2) how many. Thank the homosexual activists who broke the damn.


49 posted on 05/06/2014 4:21:48 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I never thought the three words “frenching a grasshopper” would ever come together in a thought sentence.


50 posted on 05/06/2014 4:23:43 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Me neither but then I don’t talk to many liberals. ;-)


51 posted on 05/06/2014 4:27:21 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Adios marriage. We hardly knew you. A brave new world of extremely profitable business for the wedding and divorce industries.


52 posted on 05/06/2014 4:48:28 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Hey, I’d he thinks he’s really a girl, and presents himself as one, who are we to disagree? < /lib>


53 posted on 05/06/2014 5:01:11 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Dude! You’ve never frenched a hopper?


54 posted on 05/06/2014 5:02:54 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

I know what you mean. The news has started referring to pre-sex-change transgender males as “she.” I think. I just don’t know what they’re talking about anymore.


55 posted on 05/06/2014 5:16:28 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Forget the morality aspect; what I want to know is how will those 3 hogs fit into the same bed?


56 posted on 05/06/2014 5:41:45 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Awe............more courages brave and inspiring heros to look up to


57 posted on 05/06/2014 7:01:03 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's probably been done. How about several men and several women? The possibilities for "marriage" are endless.

But when the dust clears, we all know which institution will be left standing.

58 posted on 05/06/2014 7:14:10 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon

...OR:

vomit (v).....................


59 posted on 05/07/2014 6:13:17 AM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

They have tried that in the past.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyamory


60 posted on 05/07/2014 6:16:37 AM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson