Skip to comments.
BREAKING: House Will Vote Today on Lerner Contempt
Town Hall ^
| 5/6/14
| Katie Pavlich
Posted on 05/06/2014 9:46:21 AM PDT by Nachum
The House of Representatives will vote today, Tuesday, at 5 pm on whether to hold former head of tax exempt groups at the IRS Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress. Lerner was voted in contempt by the House Oversight Committee back in April after failing to answer questions from lawmakers. Many argue Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights last year because she made an opening statement declaring her innocence before claiming she wanted to remain silent.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: contempt; house; lerner; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Nachum
I hope this doesn’t turn out to be straight party line vote.
21
posted on
05/06/2014 10:14:28 AM PDT
by
Baynative
(How much longer will the media be able to prop up this administration?)
To: Nachum
http://house.gov/representatives/
Call your representative, even if a Democrat.
They are all up for reelection in November, so tell them this vote will be a factor in voting decision.
We can’t make a difference unless we try.
22
posted on
05/06/2014 10:22:23 AM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: Tupelo
Vote will be along party lines, so contempt is a given I need to get me some of what you're smoking..............
23
posted on
05/06/2014 10:55:00 AM PDT
by
varon
(Para bellum)
To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
2PM pacific...stay tuned.
24
posted on
05/06/2014 10:57:29 AM PDT
by
lonevoice
(We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality)
To: ChildOfThe60s
25
posted on
05/06/2014 11:41:12 AM PDT
by
PhiloBedo
(You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
To: PhiloBedo
Oops. LOL. I guess I stunned everyone with my brilliance that time.
26
posted on
05/06/2014 12:18:09 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: Nachum
they should have done this April 15 and sent a message
To: Nachum
28
posted on
05/06/2014 1:18:54 PM PDT
by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
To: NormsRevenge
29
posted on
05/06/2014 1:20:43 PM PDT
by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
To: hondact200
30
posted on
05/06/2014 1:22:46 PM PDT
by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
To: elcid1970
Why the 5:00 p.m. timing? Thats near the peak of the daily news cycle.It's timed for tomorrow's papers and morning news.
Will any network cover the votes as theyre recorded?
No, no more than they cover any other vote of congress live.
31
posted on
05/06/2014 1:23:46 PM PDT
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels"-- Tom Waits)
To: Kenny Bunk
There were what were seen as good reasons for direct election of senators, and by the time the 17th Amendment was proposed, most states had gone to a system whereby the legislatures rubber stamped a popular vote. That's why it was ratified so quickly.
One effect the old system had was turning state legislature races into little more than referenda on senate candidates. Remember the Lincoln-Douglas debates, in which the two men campaigned up and down Illinois for the senate seat. People weren't voting for state legislators on the basis of state issues--they were voting for electors for senator who incidentally would hold state legislature seats.
Finally, a series of scandals demonstrated that it was pretty easy to buy a senate seat when you only had to bribe a few state legislators.
32
posted on
05/06/2014 1:33:10 PM PDT
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels"-- Tom Waits)
To: Nachum
So, the vote is in about 20 minutes?
33
posted on
05/06/2014 1:40:16 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Uninstall Fascist Firefox. Get Pale Moon.)
To: ChildOfThe60s
The ‘60’s took a toll on everyone who lived through it. ;)
34
posted on
05/06/2014 1:50:27 PM PDT
by
PhiloBedo
(You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
To: RandallFlagg
To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Bubba, I refuse to let the inconveniently accurate factual data at your command screw up my pet project!
In my own admittedly cursory review of our history, IIRC, there has never been such a collection of billionaire crooks and ass-klowns as we now have in the Senate.
state legislature races into little more than referenda on senate candidates.
True then. But now? Still preferable to popular election by today's idiotic majority-minority government-dependent voters of the big states. Do you, Bubba, really think that ANY state legislature would send an Al Franken to DC as a Senator?
36
posted on
05/06/2014 2:41:14 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunk
(Take congress in 2014. Have a Constitutional Convention of the States. Save the Republic.)
To: RandallFlagg
I don’t know....Haven’t seen or heard diddlysquat.
37
posted on
05/06/2014 3:01:26 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Don't give up! The liberals are buggering and aborting themselves into extinction.)
To: Kenny Bunk
I think they would have sent Franken. Minnesota is full of idiots.
38
posted on
05/06/2014 3:04:53 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
To: Bubba Ho-Tep; Kenny Bunk
Remember the Lincoln-Douglas debates, in which the two men campaigned up and down Illinois for the senate seat. People weren't voting for state legislators on the basis of state issues--they were voting for electors for senator who incidentally would hold state legislature seats. The question still is, would you rather have your Senate candidates lobby up and down your state to influence your locally elected assemblymen's votes, or would you want your Senator living comfortably in his home in DC getting his popular election campaign funds from Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer's PAC?
To whom would your Senator be more beholden, the locally elected assemblymen or Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer? Whose agenda would more likely be top-of-mind of your Senator?
-PJ
39
posted on
05/06/2014 3:14:45 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: RandallFlagg
Just heard the vote will be tomorrow.
40
posted on
05/06/2014 3:17:59 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Don't give up! The liberals are buggering and aborting themselves into extinction.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson