Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPsterinMA; Impy; NFHale
RE :”That’s exactly what I was saying when I posted the points about Ronald Reagan.
The “purists” are gonna have a hard time finding a candidate that can garner more than 1% of the popular vote.
It’s best they stay at Old Country Buffet, waiting for Lawrence Welk to come on.”

I still see Scott Walker, assuming he wins reelection, as someone who could make it to the WH, who actually had to run a state and make it work (and make things better), who gave Dems one hell of a beating , and survived.

He's got the look and the voice and the demeanor on cam to possibly beat a Dem in a POTUS race.

But the purists, as you call them, will insist on someone so pure that he never accomplished anything.

Like the shutdown, designed from the start to lose to Obama.
Beating Obama had nothing to do with it.

Same with picking a candidate. Recall the momma bear in 2011. That silliness just led to Romney. (obviously not a key factor)

150 posted on 05/07/2014 8:50:44 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

I’m good with Walker.

Walker/Cruz or Walker/West would be a nice combination.


151 posted on 05/08/2014 4:48:20 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson