Posted on 05/05/2014 6:06:57 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Hopefully the TEA party will be more committed to integrity than Newt was.
We may have a veto proof congress happening. If true, zero is toast.
This scares the GOPe.
That would truly be a miracle in the Senate. Let’s not get cocky.
Having a GOP controlled Senate creates its own problems.
This gives them plenty of time to screw things up and snatch VICTORY FOR THE OLIGARCHY from the jaws of VICTORY FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
His signature legislation "Obamacare" proved to be a blunder of Ceausescuian proportions, yet, Obama unilaterally declared the debate to be over. Tone-deaf Obama forgets that:
<><> no political question is ever permanently settled,
<><>Obamacare clone, "Hillary-Care," shoulda been a lesson learned, but Obama stupidly forged ahead,
<><> negative soundings from the grassroots, were prophetic---but loyal Dummycrats sap-happily lock-stepped w/ Obama.
================================================
Amazingly stupid is that the 2014 Democrats are hopping onto the ACA bandwagon---embracing what they claim are ObamaCare's "positives," even though healthcare is a bigger political bomb now than it was when Dems party got shellacked in 2010.
Lock-stepping Democrats face 2014's gale force political headwinds, dissatisfaction in their own ranks, struggling voters living with a dismal economy, the coast-to-coast disgust that Obama is dragging the country in the wrong direction----all surefire losers at the polls.
President Obama is near all-time lows on his approval ratings and was labeled 'political poison' to the partys candidates. .... being tied to an unpopular president can be a millstone around an eager politician's neck. Democrats want some of Obama's pull, but Obama, himself, should get out of their way.....and stay the hell in Washington.
==================================================
BACKSTORY In 2009, retiring Arkansas Rep. Marion Berry presciently warned that ObamaCare was setting up Democrats for a huge 2010 midterm defeat; just as HillaryCare led to Democrat loss of 54 House seats in 1994.
Obama scoffed at such concerns; he told Berry, Well, the big difference here is youve got me.
SO MUCH FOR O'S EGOTISM 2010 Republicans went on to win 63 House seats and six Senate seats.....the largest swing to Repubs in the House since 1938. So Obama was right---the difference was him. ROTFL.
Onward to 2014-2016.
THAT’S the typical scenario....
We’ll see.
Don’t rule out massive voter fraud.
The makers of Depends must be working triple-overtime shipping all those orders to Capitol Hill and to the DNC.
It's going to take a number of things to make any significant changes:
1. Not a Republican win but a Conservative win.
2. Solid Conservative House leadership.
3. Solid Conservative Senate leadership.
4. Enough Conservative replacements so that a Conservative agenda can be passed with a veto-proof majority in both houses.
To say we can win big is one thing - for us to win big in the right way is the only thing that will make it meaningful.
And this survey was with “adults,” which could be transients lined up outside the welfare office. Add 10 points if they had surveyed “likely voters.”
If so our problem will be the GOP establishment. We get a veto proof Congress we need to reverse Obama’s economic, health care, environmental, and social policies.
From your lips to God’s ears. I hope so AND I hope they UTILIZE THAT POWER.
Yes it does. That is why we are seeing them purposely trying to mute the enthusiasm and dampen Tea Party/Conservative prospects. I don’t think the “leadership” really want to win big. They want to win just big enough and then push through some of these stupid caves on immigration and such.
No immigration reform this year...
Related news...
Republicans Close to Taking Over More State Legislatures
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Republican-legislatures-2014-elections/2014/05/05/id/569440/
Exactly.
I remember when the grifter took office, they fired attorney’s general, all of them, all 50 states.
From the media, not a word of protest. Does anyone believe the media is less complicit than they were in 1992?
Does anyone think the drama over Benghazi was anything other than, well Jay, we have to give you a little spanking, we won’t use the buckle end, when it’s done we can go back to you telling outrageous lies and we will faithfully pen them, broadcast them, and smear anyone who protests otherwise.
Okay bend over now, here comes a little slap with a paint stirrer. Don’t cry, it’s as much as we’ll do.
Wretches.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.