Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Rep. Schiff calls on party to boycott new Benghazi investigation
Fox News ^ | May 4, 2014

Posted on 05/04/2014 6:43:27 AM PDT by don-o

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: csvset

41 posted on 05/04/2014 8:28:20 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Adam you are needed now as a diplomat on the front line of defense in Afghanistan! Get your scrawny butt over there!
When did America lose Truth, Honor and Justice for a sack of Schiff and bag lying dimmocrates.


42 posted on 05/04/2014 9:46:33 AM PDT by DocJhn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Yep.


43 posted on 05/04/2014 10:01:10 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: csvset

If it advanced the liberal agenda, the answer is yes.

Dems are sick sub-human organism and should be treated like the disease they are.


44 posted on 05/04/2014 10:04:17 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Hey Adam, you short sighted tool, don’t set a precedent you can’t live with.


45 posted on 05/04/2014 10:20:46 AM PDT by cashless (Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset

The elephant in the room is where our Dictator was during the event, why did he choose to do nothing and let our people be slaughtered, and the conspiracy to silence and intimidate the survivors, not to mention what kind of illegal arms trafficking they were involve in that provoked the attack in the first place.

Then there is the matter of the guy they still have in prison for posting an anti-raghead video on YouTube


46 posted on 05/04/2014 10:28:14 AM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: don-o

This whole sad post-Benghazi attack situation started because the
Democrats were playing politics, trying to save Obama’s job. Now,
the Democrats are accusing the GOP of playing politics. Disgusting.

MSNBC’s Scarborough got one thing right. As far as the Democrats are
concerned Republican blunders are always scandals while their
own blunders are always “just politics”.


47 posted on 05/04/2014 10:37:27 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster
that would definitely remove some of the obstacles

That's what I was thinking. Without the dems there running interference, I'm assuming the 'pubs are serious about it, they might actually accomplish something.

48 posted on 05/04/2014 10:44:32 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“I look forward to Nuremberg trials for them all.”

But, the Dems would still boycott them. The fact is that the Dems will avoid reality until their lives are at stake. This is why there can never be compromise with these type of people and ultimately it comes down to a fight to the finish.


49 posted on 05/04/2014 10:49:20 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Dec 2013

While appearing to strain to give a recent New York Times’ report on Benghazi at least some credit by saying it “add’s valuable insights,” even Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) agrees with Republican Mike Rogers that the Times’ report is inaccurate. Schiff also contends that, contrary to the NYT’s reporting, al Qaeda most definitely was involved.

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/12/29/Even-Dem-Rep-Schiff-Doesn-t-Buy-Latest-NYT-s-Benghazi-Story


50 posted on 05/04/2014 10:56:41 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

This is some silly Schiff, no whut ah meen?


51 posted on 05/04/2014 11:06:38 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Flack = Over The Target


52 posted on 05/04/2014 3:38:24 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Enough White House lies on Benghazi

By: David Limbaugh
5/2/2014 06:00 AM

The Obama administration has no shred of integrity left concerning the Benghazi scandal. Caught in the act with the “loaded gun,” those in the administration are telling us it is a toy pistol, but no honest observer can possibly believe them anymore.

It took a lawsuit to force the White House to release emails that reveal just how deliberate and fraudulent the plan was to deceive the press and the American public about the cause of the attack on our consulate in Libya.

The incident and a nearby attack a few hours later, in which four Americans were killed, occurred in September 2012, just a few short months before the November presidential election. Obama’s foreign policy credibility was on the line, for he had long boasted that he had al-Qaida on the run, despite his efforts to relax our war on terror into a law enforcement matter (except for his precious drones, of course).

Reports emerged that there had been previous attempted attacks on the consulate and that our people there had asked for heightened security, which the administration callously rejected. Was this sheer indifference or a result of Obama’s concern that enhancing security would signal a failure in his magical policy of appeasing terrorists? Either way, it was disgraceful.

It was obvious at the time but is now undeniable that with cold premeditation, the administration hatched a sinister ploy to blame the attacks on an anti-Islam video that had surfaced on the Internet. There was no evidence that this video had incited the Benghazi attacks or that the attacks were spontaneous but much evidence that they were preplanned by al-Qaida terrorists. But the entire White House spin machine immediately went into overdrive constructing and disseminating this false narrative, even to the point of having federal authorities arrest the hapless creator of the video, whom they nabbed on other charges. This was a horrifying abuse of government power starting at the very top, and it is not the America any of us should love.

Finally, after a year of withholding internal emails, the White House, under legal compulsion, turned them over to Judicial Watch. Included was an email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, dated Sept. 14, 2012. Its subject heading was “RE: PREP CALL with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET,” and the email was sent to about a dozen members of Obama’s inner circle, including press secretary Jay Carney.

The thrust of the message was clear: Protect Obama’s image (and re-election efforts) at all costs; American interests and the American public’s right to know be damned. It contained four bullet points:

The rest of the scandal

http://www.humanevents.com/2014/05/02/enough-white-house-lies-on-benghazi/


53 posted on 05/04/2014 6:56:40 PM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson