Skip to comments.
Republicans Don’t Want America to Give Up Control of Web Addresses
TIME ^
| April 10, 2014
| Denver Nicks
Posted on 05/02/2014 3:11:22 PM PDT by celmak
Democrats and Republicans both say they want keep the Internet free and open for all. They disagree about who should guard the guards
House Republicans advanced legislation Thursday that they say will keep the Internet open and free from government censorship. Every Democrat on the panel considering the measure opposed it in service, they say, of the same goal.
At issue is a question with profound implications for the future of global communications that delves into the deepest bowels of the Internet, and a version of the age-old question: Who guards the guards?
(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: internet; piracy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Have not seen this issue here. Your Thoughts on the subject?
1
posted on
05/02/2014 3:11:22 PM PDT
by
celmak
To: celmak
We paid for it,
DARPA designed and developed it, and so we own it. Period.
2
posted on
05/02/2014 3:15:16 PM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: Timber Rattler
Republicans Dont Want America to Give Up Control of Web Addresses... ...because they're all rassists.
3
posted on
05/02/2014 3:18:43 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: celmak
Republicans don’t like kittens..!
Republicans sometimes don’t hold doors open..!
Republicans sometimes wear unmatched socks...!
—>MEDIA GRASPING AT STRAWS<—
4
posted on
05/02/2014 3:19:03 PM PDT
by
gaijin
Next thing you know they’ll give away the Panama Canal.
5
posted on
05/02/2014 3:26:39 PM PDT
by
Rio
(Proud resident of the State of Jefferson)
To: celmak
Come on Republicans, we can do this. Anyone that believes this administration about anything (if you like your doctor, healthcare will be cheaper, etc.) is not living in the present reality. We do not need to give up control in this area.
To: celmak
Yep. Those evil uncaring Republicans.
They just don’t care. And they just won’t share.
7
posted on
05/02/2014 3:30:11 PM PDT
by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: celmak
IIRC, the last article I read about this said the idea of the US giving this up was being rethought. No link, sorry.
May cooler heads prevail. There is no REASON to give this up.
8
posted on
05/02/2014 3:31:42 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(Support ABLE, the Anybody But Lindsey Effort. Yes, we are the ABLE!!)
To: celmak
Don’t give it up. Governments and the UN would love to take control over it. Don’t let them.
9
posted on
05/02/2014 3:41:14 PM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: mojito
Yep. Those evil uncaring Republicans. They just dont care. I could not agree more. How many times can people be lied to and hoodwinked by this political good cop, bad cop con-job?
10
posted on
05/02/2014 3:47:38 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: celmak
Anyone else taking control will definitely result in censorship. He**, I worry about censorship with this crew from the USA in control!
11
posted on
05/02/2014 3:48:18 PM PDT
by
originalbuckeye
(Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
To: Rio
That was sarcasm right? We already returned the Panama Canal to Panama.
12
posted on
05/02/2014 3:48:19 PM PDT
by
Kackikat
To: I want the USA back
Last two paragraphs of the article:
A number of prominent human rights organizations, including Freedom House, Human Rights Watch and the New America Foundation come out publicly against the DOTCOM Act, arguing that the bill undermines Americas moral authority by lending credibility to authoritarian regimes that point to American oversight of the domain name system as proof that the U.S. isnt as free as it claims to be. We share the DOTCOM Act sponsors goal of a free and open Internet, New America Foundation Policy Director Kevin Bankston said, but the bill actually threatens that goal and plays into the hands of those who want to use the Internet as an instrument of political control rather than preserve it as a global platform for free expression.
Looking the first paragraph of these two, like I said above, there's no R.E.A.S.O.N to do this. It's a lame brain idea from the Commerce Dept. They are afraid other countries will say nasty things about the US if we don't give this precious resource away. When's the last time you heard anybody complain about the way we're running this?
Typical RATS, this is all about feelings. Haven't you heard? The US is full of racists who want to dominate the Internet!
13
posted on
05/02/2014 3:50:05 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(Support ABLE, the Anybody But Lindsey Effort. Yes, we are the ABLE!!)
To: Steely Tom
'....now thats just plain juvenile..."
14
posted on
05/02/2014 3:56:18 PM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
To: upchuck
but the bill actually threatens that goal and plays into the hands of those who want to use the Internet as an instrument of political control rather than preserve it as a global platform for free expression.Exactly what the current regieme desires.
15
posted on
05/02/2014 4:05:38 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(If you like your health plan, you're a racist !)
To: celmak
It’s not just Republicans.
16
posted on
05/02/2014 4:18:56 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Rio
Well, we do have the Black Jimmy Carter as POTUS.
17
posted on
05/02/2014 4:49:59 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: Timber Rattler
"We paid for it, DARPA designed and developed it, and so we own it. Period."
Good answer. So many useful idiots have tried revisionist propaganda against that.
18
posted on
05/02/2014 5:00:03 PM PDT
by
familyop
To: celmak
I guess Barack the Kenyan is just going to have to teach us to “evolve.” We’re NOT No. 1 anymore Toto. Thanks Barry!
19
posted on
05/02/2014 5:38:29 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
To: celmak
Have not seen this issue here. Your Thoughts on the subject? Well, let's talk about the real-world implications...
Suppose you spend a fortune building up the web site "NextBigThing.com". Then, one day you find that the domain name has mysteriously been mapped to the IP address of somebody in some other country.
You built up the company, but now someone else has taken it over with a SINGLE KEYSTROKE!
In short...this is H-U-G-E ... it significantly erodes the value of every US-owned web site.
20
posted on
05/02/2014 8:38:39 PM PDT
by
The Duke
("Forgiveness is between them and God, it's my job to arrange the meeting.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson