Posted on 05/02/2014 7:26:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Last November, Seattle elected a straight-up socialist to their City Council who, among other economic/social-justice aspirations, included the already popular idea of a minimum wage hike to $15/hour in her campaign platform. Evidently, the fact that that is now very likely going to happen in a gradual phase-in over the next few years isn’t quite good enough for her, via the NYT:
Mayor Ed Murray presented on Thursday what he described as an imperfect but workable plan to increase the citys minimum wage to $15 an hour, more than twice the federal minimum wage and one of the highest anywhere in the nation, through a series of complex and phased-in stages. Just as crucially, he said, the plan has broad political support, with a coalition of labor and business groups ready to push hard for it at the City Council, starting with the first hearings next week.
But the plan, which in many other cities might be seen as a liberal Democratic agenda at the frontier of social and economic engineering, was immediately attacked not from the mayors right, but from his left.
Kshama Sawant, a Socialist Alternative Party member who was elected to the Seattle City Council last year on a single-minded drive to raise wages, said the plan had been watered down by business interests on the mayors 24-member committee on income inequality, of which she was also a member. In a packed news conference at City Hall right after Mr. Murrays, she called on her supporters to continue their effort to gather signatures for a possible ballot initiative on wages this fall. The campaign might also put pressure on the Council to make the mayors plan better for workers, she suggested. Every year of a phase-in means yet another year in poverty for a worker, Ms. Sawant said. Our work is far from done.
A handy 21 of the city’s 24 council members are on board with the plan, which designates that large Seattle-based employers (with 500+ employees, no matter where those employees are in the country) start paying the $15/hour rate as soon as 2017 with smaller businesses phasing in by 2021 — and all this despite the fact that Washington already has the highest minimum wage in the country:
Washington is home to the nations highest state minimum wage, at $9.32 an hour. As of April 8, 38 states had considered minimum wage bills in 2014, with 34 of them considering increases, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Minnesota and West Virginia have passed increases. Hawaii is expected to join that list after legislators approved a future hike Tuesday to $10.10, the level President Obama has pushed for nationwide. Workers in several states will see minimum wages of at least $10 in several states within a few years.
States and cities have led the charge as federal legislation has languished. San Francisco started the year with a $10.74 minimum wage, while Sante Fes hit $10.66 on March 1. A $15 minimum wage went into effect for some workers on Jan. 1 in SeaTac, the small city that is home to SeattleTacoma International Airport.
I might add that, while a “coalition of business and labor groups are ready to push hard” for the hike, there are other groups equally ready to push hard against it:
Seattles push to become the first big U.S. city with a $15-an-hour minimum wage has hit a snag: opposition from waiters and bartenders. …
People are talking about moving to a European system of tipping, says Maloney, 28, meaning less automatic and not as generous. She has become a spokeswoman for a group called Tips Are Wages, appearing in the Seattle Times, KIRO Radio, and other local media to argue for a carve-out that keeps tipped workers at a lower minimum. I have built a life around the current model of tipping, she says. …
Restaurants have warned they might boost menu prices as much as 25 percent or force servers to share more of their tips with cooks, dishwashers, and other back-of-the-house staff. …
Kshama Sawant, a socialist elected to the council on her own $15 pledge, calls those suggestions fear mongering and says people who cling to tips miss the point. We dont want any worker to be beholden to the mood of the customer on any given day, she says.
Well. So much for the “service” industry.
I would estimate that Seattle will eventually come to regret this decision in the long run, but hey, that’s what federalism and local governance are for, I suppose — a notion that desperate Democrats in Washington are currently refusing to grasp.
This will go the same way as the public bathrooms that were placed in the parks and the monorail extension.
Seattle the new Greece.
Seattle sounding like Detroit.
I lived on Seattle’s east side for 45 years. I moved to central KY three years ago. The difference in the physical appearance of people between the two places is almost a tangible observation - and a great deal of it is just how many really fat people there are here and, even more significantly, how few HWP people there are here.
That and the quality of the cars...
It will have a big inflationary impact on prices locally.
I’m all for stupidity at the local level.
But why stop there? Shouldn’t everyone live like the 1%? Make it $1000/hr.
Why not $150.00 per hour?
If you are going to do something, do it right!
RE: Why not $150.00 per hour?
Because most office workers will quit their jobs to apply to become Starbuck baristas.
Instead of $15 per hour they should enact a ‘living wage rate’.
Then, by accompanying law, each month, the actual dollar amount paid to minimum wage earners could be adjusted to reflect the actual required ‘living wage’.
Problem solved.
I was informed, some unrecorded number of years ago, that the federal government has authority to set private sector wages only during a declared state of emergency.
However, the joy that chief executives derive from thus meddling in the private business economy is so great, almost orgasmic, apparently, that it has become an accepted practice despite the state of emergency having long expired.
But from what source do city mayors derive authority to set wage amounts? Does it exist simply because no one opposes their doing so?
Do you like Kentucky? We live in WA and thinking about different places to retire.
It won't be long before the "beautiful people" will have to drive to a different city for anything.
We call our place “the garden of eden, but with more ticks”. We have chickens that keep the bugs down and have absolute quiet and privacy. I worried about radar cops every minute behind the wheel in Seattle (when I wasn’t in agonizing trafic, that is). We’ve been here three years and I don’t even think about it, and I have a 125 mile round trip commute every day. But it’s through spectacular scenery on fun twisties and I never tire of it.
Real estate taxes are very low, but there is a state income tax. The climate is spectacular. We get more rain and don’t water our lawns. But the rain comes in storms, not two weeks of drizzle at a time. Rain rarely cancels a picknic. You just run for cover for a few minutes and when it’s done, go back out and finish your softball game in the sun.
Our place: http://s409.photobucket.com/user/robbbb4/slideshow/Kentucky%20home
For me the real question is this:
Are the Current Union contracts, both government and Private, based on the Minimum wage?
If so then we might see the hand manipulating the Council. Higher union wages because of the rise in the Minimum wage translates to more money going to the union from dues. That also means more money going into the Democrat coffers.
Who loses? Everyone else...
My my. The progressives (aka the communists) have an “agenda” to enact.
Reality be damned.
This will turn out well, just like all their other schemes.
Couldn’t happen to a nicer, Lenin-worshipping city.
the results will be hilarious
the end of job-lock and the economic stimulus of welfare -
lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.