Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cloudmountain

I think the interbreeding theory is extremely unlikely. It would require that the 2 groups co-habitate and that there be virtually no preference for mating within one’s group rather than with the other. This simply doesnt happen with primates or other territorial animals. It also requires that the offspring of such a mating are fertile which is also unlikely. It is much more likely that one group wiped out the other either through disease, aggression, or outcompeting them for resources. Even if the 2 groups were equally intelligent, a difference in the level of aggression of one culture relative to the other is enough to cause extinction of the less aggressive group.


92 posted on 04/30/2014 4:25:04 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Brooklyn Attitude

You are probably right.


95 posted on 04/30/2014 6:24:40 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Brooklyn Attitude
I think the interbreeding theory is extremely unlikely. It would require that the 2 groups co-habitate and that there be virtually no preference for mating within one’s group rather than with the other. This simply doesnt happen with primates or other territorial animals.

You have men willing to copulate with goats and chickens. A Neanderthal girl would not be any big deal.

A standard of conquest is that the winning tribe kills the men, and enslaves the women and children, especially the more attractive women.

99 posted on 04/30/2014 6:43:19 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson