[17th Miss Regt]

The recording sounds so staged on her part- she knew she was baiting him into saying something bad.

Why isn't she being prosecuted for this recording? In California both parties must agree to recording before it can be legally done.

The wife's lawsuit against her was for her embezzling, wasn't it?

[Hegewisch Dupa]

isn’t that for it to be used as legal evidence?

[GIdget2004]

“Why isn’t she being prosecuted for this recording? In California both parties must agree to recording before it can be legally done.”

She and TMZ both claim that he knew he was being recorded, and when you hear the full recording, it’s clear he knew. I don’t know if that’s true or if we’ll ever hear evidence, but that’s what is being ‘reported’.

[P-Marlowe]

Why isn't she being prosecuted for this recording? In California both parties must agree to recording before it can be legally done.

I take it you are in favor of prosecuting James O'Keefe for his videos of government crooks and Lila Rose who videotapes the abortion facilities?

Should only the government be allowed to secretly tape your conversations?

[grania]

Why isn't she being persecuted for this recording?

What about all of the media who played an illegal tape? What about the NBA commisionar handing down a decision based on an illegal tape?