Posted on 04/29/2014 4:30:19 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
A Miami man spent ten days in jail for recording police arresting his friend, accused of falsifying his name when all he did was refuse to provide his name on the basis that he wasnt doing anything illegal.
In fact, Lazaro Estrada followed the Miami-Dade police officers initial orders to scurry back inside a store because the cop insisted he was in fear for his life, claiming the man he had handcuffed was still armed.
(Excerpt) Read more at photographyisnotacrime.com ...
It does seem that’s where things are heading, huh? Surprised we’ve not seen it yet...
But the court did say that the citizen is required to tell the police his or her name if asked. Anyone familiar with this case?
Close. It was Hiibel. The court said that the suspect has to give his name if the police explain what he is suspected of doing.
Of course they can SAY they suspect you of kidnapping the Lindbergh baby or anything else they choose.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial_District_Court_of_Nevada
Also SCOTUS has determined that overly broad loitering laws are unconstitutional. It would be hard for the cops to use that as a excuse to arrest a guy who was in an area for just a few minutes and had a legal reason to be there, namely to make a recording of the cops.
No! See my post 23.
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. -Ayn Rand
Thank you for the information. For some reason I thought that one did. Again, thanks.
Actually, the guy with a camera owned the business where this was taking place...AND, if the video I saw on a local
Miami station was accurate, it appears the cops WENT INSIDE HIS BUSINESS to take a camera....someone was filming them from INSIDE, too.
I don’t like this one bit.
They get bolder and bolder.
The question is how the loitering statute is written.
Public employees should be under public scrutiny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.