Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC_Conspirator

The question isn’t how much we like the daily beast, but how much of a failure is this fighter and this program. Is it, or isn’t it.

If it is a failure it adds weight to the argument that we don’t need manned fighters at all.


5 posted on 04/28/2014 1:22:31 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman
If it is a failure it adds weight to the argument that we don’t need manned fighters at all.

That is what I think we should start moving to right now. they would be smaller, or the same size with more and better weapons.

8 posted on 04/28/2014 2:31:24 AM PDT by Captainpaintball (Immigration without assimilation is the death of a nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman

“If it is a failure it adds weight to the argument that we don’t need manned fighters at all.”

Necessity being the mother of invention and Israel having some of the best drone technology, I’d guess the next middle east war will be the one to end manned aircraft as battle weapons. It would not surprise me if Israel currently has a major strike force that’s entirely robotic.

We, on the other hand, are preparing to fight an updated World War Two areal war.

Another thing that may go away is unquestioned air superiority. With enough tiny and stealthy drones it’s almost certain that some will be where you least want them. This was one thought behind the large tanks becoming obsolete. Tanks require a huge fuel logistics footprint and without air dominance you can’t protect those tankers. A little suicide drone is all that’s needed to stop the tanks.


10 posted on 04/28/2014 3:45:03 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson