Posted on 04/25/2014 11:34:00 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Hear that thunder in the background,,it’s the big guns,,and they are getting closer to BLM.
Thank you, Cruz!
Dear BLM,
My bloodlines in this state are older than your pathetic bureaucracy. P*ss off.
bttt
” management of more than 245 million acres of public land “
What’s that you say,,PUBLIC Land?
I am the public.
Just try to occupy a piece of the “public land” and see what happens. ;-)
There is a way to do that, but we need to wait for them to act first. If they don’t cease and desist, then yes they are all open season. If not, it makes no sense to do what they do.
RED RIVER BOUNDARY COMPACT
http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/R/RE008.html
“... Gov. George W. Bush of Texas signed the legislation into law on May 24, 1999; Gov. Frank Keating of Oklahoma followed suit on June 4.
Thus, the Red River Boundary Compact became the legal document establishing the permanent political boundary between Oklahoma and Texas. The compact declares the vegetation line along the south bank of the Red River extending on a line from the 100th Meridian east to Lake Texoma as the northern border of Texas. Land between the south bank and the meridian line of the river belongs to the Kiowa, Comanche, and Apache tribes and is held in trust by the federal government. The riverbed north of the meridian line belongs to the state of Oklahoma. The lone exception to the south bank being the northern border of Texas is spelled out under Article II, Section b.1, which states that in the Texoma area the boundary extends from “the intersection of the vegetation line on the south bank with the east bank of Shawnee Creek.” The line, depicted by the characters (”-..-”) in the Lake Texoma Fishing and Boating Map, Number A353, continues to the foot of the Denison Dam....”
Doesn’t sound like there’s much land in the BLM’s hands.
That raises a question or two. There are landowners along the Red River holding title for a hundred or more years.
Now the Governors of Oklahoma and Texas may indeed have some right to agree where the boundary between two states are subject to the legislature passing such a law.
That doesn’t give them the right to ignore the private property interests and declare any part of the individuals property holdings to belong to the Indians, or the Feds, does it?
Just because the river changes course, shouldn’t change the ownership of the actual land, it should just mean that the individual may own more or less in Texas or Oklahoma.
This is a fine example why Ted Cruz was elected over Dewhurst.
Love it Ted.
Any rancher man does an invite, may have to take’em up on some campfire, chilli and a sud or two.
/johnny
Love that flag! Is it available anywhere?
"On what Constitutional grounds do you continue to own any of this land?"
Easter's over...our Reps need to get back to work, and cease riding the coattails of Senator Cruz!!!!!!
An “off the charts brilliant” lawyer doesn’t ask questions to which he doesn’t already know the answers, therefore, Ted has set a trap for the BLM. I can’t wait to see what it is.
lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.