” ... the University of California system is more private than public”
The UC system is public, despite the fact that it receives less than half of its funding from the state. Restrictions of speech on public property are viewed very skeptically by the courts.
In this case, UH would have to argue compellingly that some important public purpose (safety, for example) is served by the restrictions.
>>In this case, UH would have to argue compellingly that some important public purpose (safety, for example) is served by the restrictions.<<
Agreed and I don’t know why UH is fighting this. Do they not have Legal Counsel to tell them they will probably lose?
The only conclusion I can come to is probably every judge in HI is an uber-liberal and will back the up, USC be damned.