Posted on 04/25/2014 9:14:44 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
A mother-of-nine who claims £38,000 a year in handouts and demanded a bigger council house for her huge family is pregnant again - this time with twins.
Cheryl Prudham, 32, and her husband Robert, 29, are set to receive at least a further £1,400 in handouts when the baby girls arrive.
Mrs Prudham said she will 'not be made to feel guilty' for having children' as she and her husband both work part-time.
Last year the couple, from Sittingbourne, Kent - who were living in a three-bedroom council house at the time - said they were entitled to a bigger house, because they both work part-time.
Eventually the couple were able to arrange a house swap and they moved to a £200,000 property, also in Kent, the Sun reports.
But the expectant mother is still not happy with the swap - organised via Facebook with a family looking to downsize - because she had to move away from her preferred area of Sittingbourne.
She admits her huge brood were not especially planned because she and her husband do not like using contraception.
Speaking after her bid for a new house last year, she said: 'In the past I have been on contraception but I got pregnant with the coil and the pill just doesn't settle well with me.
'We don't use condoms and me and Rob have never talked about it.
'I did rely on benefits before but I am motivated to be more than a mother.'
And she admitted: 'I was surprised by the cost of our kids in the end.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I agree.
A while back when my libinlaw was talking the ol’ “rich don’t pay enough taxes” BS, I got the list of what each percentage paid.
The bottom 10% paid MINUS 4 percent in income tax.
She, of course, wouldn’t believe it.
funny movie until you realize that it is dead on correct
38,000 GBP equals $63,844.01 USD. 1,400# more totals out to $66,192.63, a tidy sum, indeed. She doesn’t like rubbers or the pill, and the foam was too bitter... How’s about a coupon for a free vasectomy there, pop?
A guy 29 years old has no means nor intention of taking care of this kids. The woman and the government is allowing this
They are british. They are entitled to whatever largess the british people choose to give them.
Muslim invaders should not be.
Especially when there are loads of 29yr old polygamous muslim men who have no intention of (or ability to) take care of their multiple wives and scads of children.
You are aware that the Boston bomber’s wife and child were on Mass benefits are you not? Was he unable to support his wife and kid? Or did he choose not to...From all appearances it would appear to be the latter.
In fact, the whole family, his parents, siblings their spouses and children were all on benefits. Were all the men in that family unable to care for their children? OR did they choose not to because, hey, jizya payments!
You know, I probably could do.
Much use of the prepositional phrase in there and lots of rant
Consequences of a strong early (Dominican led) background in grammar and reinforced by the writings of Buckley and Weigel
I don’t think we would be having these problems if we had low taxes and a sound dollar.
Decent people who limit their families to the number they can support will have to give up even more for these parasites. This woman is a model liberal, and she disgusts me. Demanding a larger home?
It's only fair, since you're rich and you have one. /sarc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.