Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEAN HANNITY Responds to Bundy’s “Beyond Repugnant, Beyond Despicable” Racist Comments (Video)
The Gateway Pundit ^ | 4-24-2014 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 04/24/2014 1:46:38 PM PDT by servo1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-384 next last
To: servo1969

def’n: racism is an intentional, purposeful difference in treatment of two individuals based soley on superficial, outward racial characteristics (e.g., skin color).

and, mr hannity and his apologists, exactly how does mr bundy’s rhetorical question pointing out the similarity in the gov’t’s current enslavement of blacks via entitlement with it’s previous enslavement via law constitute a difference or even a belief in the rightness of differential treatment between himself and blacks (or any other race)? the logic or reason of mr. hannity’s position eludes me.

in fact, it seems to me that mr. bundy is rightly pointing out that it is the leftist that is the real racist, continuing to purpose and execute his statist brand of racism via institutionalization of gov’t dependence targeted at various racial and ethnic groups.


101 posted on 04/24/2014 2:33:41 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
So what are you going to use to clean the Lefty Racism malware out of your head, cloud?
Or are you just going to leave it there, with the rest of the Lefty malware?

Since YOU did bring it up, I guess that YOU would know ALL ABOUT Left Racism malware. Did you mommy teach you that? Is she the MOTHER of all Lefty Racism malware? Or did you make that up ALL by your lil ole self?

Hahaha, you do INDEED have entertainment value. Thanks for writing such...well never mind, you get my drift.

102 posted on 04/24/2014 2:33:41 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: bboop
So - the NYT ‘heard’ him say it? Or is this an Alinsky ‘demonize’thing? Stinks of that to me

There's a video, and the NYTimes did the old "out of context" thing.

Yes, it's the Alinsky "demonize" thingee.

One should look at this as identifying Leftist malware on the hard-drive in one's head. If you start barking at this Leftist Racism dog whistle, you've got Lefty malware on the system, and probably not just the "Racism" malware.

103 posted on 04/24/2014 2:34:20 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Bundy’s racist comments will lose him most of his public support.

Dumb! Real dumb.

104 posted on 04/24/2014 2:34:57 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

Geez, what are you? 12?

You left out “whatever you say to me bounces off and sticks to you...nananananananana”


105 posted on 04/24/2014 2:35:37 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

As long as they continue to play the state-run media’s game of intimidation they are authoring their own demise.

************

Either of them would flip so quickly they’d get whiplash. At the end of the day, each of them in his way is a system suck up.


106 posted on 04/24/2014 2:36:19 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr

I agree. They act like dogs...”look, squirrel”.


107 posted on 04/24/2014 2:36:21 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Bundy screwed up PR Rule #1: When you’re ahead in the polls, don’t go all stupid and off-topic during a live recording.

Before today, the news didn’t want to report on this, now they will. Now they will.


108 posted on 04/24/2014 2:36:26 PM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I’m trying to keep up, too, but I’m confused. What was in this new BLM contract that he objected to? Was it an increase in fees? That seems to me like a landlord raising the rent and if the tenant can’t pay, he moves somewhere else. Or was there something else? And what’s with all this turtle nonsense? This story just kind of blew up on my radar recently and I’m kind of playing catch up.


109 posted on 04/24/2014 2:38:02 PM PDT by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da

No not anybody who supported him befor.


110 posted on 04/24/2014 2:38:39 PM PDT by Mechanicos (When did we amend the Constitution for a 2nd Federal Prohibition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Pretty sure Hannity's ego makes him lurk the threads with his name, so:
Full Clip Of Cliven Bundy’s Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Anti-Government Remarks Vs. NYTimes’ Deceptively Edited Version

---

I can't believe all these oh-so-smart talking heads didn't wait at least 24 hours to make sure it had been reported accurately.

111 posted on 04/24/2014 2:38:48 PM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

...Another point: none of know Bundy or anything about his character or personality....

true but we we can see through your smoke screen and see your disinformation agenda.


112 posted on 04/24/2014 2:39:14 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain
LOL! I've forgotten more foreign languages than you know, Liebling.
113 posted on 04/24/2014 2:39:16 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain
"He should have lawyered up LONG before this."

You must not have watched the video. Bundy explained why about 3 minutes before his "controversial" comments.

114 posted on 04/24/2014 2:39:24 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
He’s been lawyered up for over 20 years as he has battled these a-holes. It’s not federal property.

TWENTY years of this nonsense?? Geez he is more of a moron that I had previously thought.

If the Texas lawyers can't take care of it in three years, then there is SOMEthing else going on. Or the lawyers down there are getting rich off of the biggest sucker they've had the good fortune to meet in many a year.

Not federal property? That's what been said on these threads for the past few days. I guess the FReepers are all wrong. I don't really care.

The feds aren't the aholes; neither is Bundy. The feds are doing their job and Bundy is getting out of paying for grazing on land that he doesn't own. It's not rocket science or anything more dramatic than a CHEAPSKATE who doesn't want to pay his bills.

Don't make this Shakespearean. It's quite mundane: cheapskate versus Uncle Sam. Gee, guess who's going to lose. Rhetorical

115 posted on 04/24/2014 2:40:24 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
I agree. They act like dogs...”look, squirrel”.

LOL! That's freaking GREAT.

116 posted on 04/24/2014 2:41:36 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

..So, why is Mr. Bundy NOT a deadbeat? Why should he not pay grazing fees when many others do?...

if you don’t know the answer to that you are uninformed.


117 posted on 04/24/2014 2:43:10 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


118 posted on 04/24/2014 2:43:29 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
What was in this new BLM contract that he objected to? Was it an increase in fees? That seems to me like a landlord raising the rent and if the tenant can’t pay, he moves somewhere else. Or was there something else? And what’s with all this turtle nonsense? This story just kind of blew up on my radar recently and I’m kind of playing catch up.

They wanted to reduce his cattle population to the point where his ranch was no longer economically viable.

Coincidentally, the trouble started in 1993, right after Bill Clinton took office.

But I'm sure there was no connection...

119 posted on 04/24/2014 2:43:53 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da
Bundy’s racist comments will lose him most of his public support.

That's probably right but the big picture still remains regardless of what one thinks about Cliven Bundy: the BLM and its squad of obama/holder thugs is most assuredly guilty.

120 posted on 04/24/2014 2:44:24 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-384 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson