Like I said, I don't think we need additional rules, we just need to enforce the constitution. If new amendments were needed, then I would say go ahead with Article V, but we don't.
Passing new laws without a plan for enforcement is a waste of time that could be put to better use enforcing what we have now.
An Article V convention is equivalent to forming a committee of state representatives to study what the 2cnd Amendment means.
We all know what it means, and efforts should be toward states refusing to honor unconstitutional abridgment of the right to bear arms.
So I just don't see an Article V as being necessary. And you still haven't answered my question - What's your plan to make sure that the new laws are followed instead of being ignored or twisted like the current laws are?
Other than electing more RINOs, what would you suggest?
"you still haven't answered my question"
I've answered it several times. Structural changes would be enforced the same way the President's term limit is now.