Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights Act: We need to redistribute wealth
Salon ^ | 4/15/2014

Posted on 04/20/2014 9:08:59 AM PDT by Altura Ct.

Even if racism were wiped out tomorrow, we'd still need to address pervasive racial wealth inequality. Here's why

Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day.

When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters) and in employment. The former purpose–eliminating public accommodations discrimination–has received renewed attention from conservatives lately who find it to be an infringement on the rights of racist business owners to be racist. GOP favorite Rand Paul expressed this view in 2010 and Cato’s Ilya Shapiro expressed it just a few months ago on MSNBC.

These aren’t new concerns, of course. One white Nashville resident interviewed at the time of passage said the same thing about the Civil Rights Act: “I also think that it is in violation to my civil rights if someone can say you must serve me.” Nonetheless, it is telling that the embarrassment attached to claiming it is the racists who are the real victims in all of this has sufficiently subsided within the mainstream conservative movement that even GOP leaders are willing to reinvigorate the claim. I suppose that’s par for the course for a movement that’s also pushed the evisceration of the Voting Rights Act and pursued an intentional campaign of voter suppression that disproportionately targets blacks and other people of color.

Despite the fevered conservative protests over the extensive reach of the the Civil Rights Act, it has not totally succeeded in its aims. Lunch counters and hotels no longer outright ban blacks from service, a relatively easy thing to root out. But academic studies show that employment decisions continue to be made upon race-based lines.

For instance, in one 2003 study, a team of researchers sent nearly 5000 resumes to over 1,300 employment ads posted in newspapers in Chicago and Boston. The resumes were totally fake and otherwise identical except that some had black-sounding names on them while others had white-sounding names on them. The researchers found that the applications with white-sounding names on them received call backs 50 percent more often than the applications with black-sounding names on them. As things usually go with racist discrimination, it can be hard to pin down a particular given instance as motivated by racism, but the aggregate numbers do not lie.

Clearly, more progress needs to be made on the anti-discrimination front, but anti-discrimination, even if it were entirely successful, would still never be enough to rectify the economic harms inflicted by centuries of slavery and racial apartheid.

One of the consequences of the racial caste system that characterized American society prior to 1960 is that black families were prevented from accumulating economic wealth. Because wealth is the kind of thing that is passed down generations and the kind of thing that grows and grows, this initial racist starting point has opened up a yawning racial wealth gap that simply cannot be closed without intentional policy aimed at doing so.

In 2010, the median black family held around $16,000 in wealth, while the median white family held around $130,000. And this is not just a function of the fact that whites have higher incomes than blacks. Even when you control for income–comparing white and black families in the same income range–white families are three times wealthier than black families. The racial wealth disparities hold up and down the income ladder.

As Thomas Piketty’s groundbreaking book “Capital in the 21st Century” has detailed: wealth has a tendency in a capitalist economy to concentrate into the hands of a few and travel down generations through gifts and inheritances. Even if racism were wiped out tomorrow and equal treatment became the norm, it would never cease being the case that the average white person has more wealth than the average black person. We could equalize everything else in society, and racial wealth inequality–plus all of the political power disparities that accompany such a thing–would continue into perpetuity.

Thus, those actually serious about righting the wrongs of enslavement and Jim Crow apartheid must support more drastic leveling efforts. Beefed up anti-discrimination, which is both necessary and good, will not be enough. Ideally, we could work towards reparations in the form of redistributing wealth along racial lines. With that an unlikely possibility though, we can at least think about ways to redistribute wealth more generally from those with wealth to those without it, something that would have a similar, albeit more attenuated, effect as reparations given who the wealthy and non-wealthy happen to be.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: alreadyposted; blackkk; communism; mattbruenig; racism; redistribution; reparations; salon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Altura Ct.
But let's not get backed into a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation:

If Republicans supported the Civil Rights Act, then they are bad, because it's a bad law.
If Republcians opposed the Civil Rights Act, then they are bad, because they are racist.

No.

Republicans wanted all people to be equal before the law. That is a worthy goal.
Republicans supported that.
Democrats opposed that.

We're the Good Guys.

21 posted on 04/20/2014 9:30:49 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Lets turn society into a racial slave tyrannocracy cuz Twinkie boy is outraged by The lack of Negro Investment Bankers!

Yay Genius Boy


22 posted on 04/20/2014 9:31:05 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The proof is in the pudding. As it stands now, as in reality, all this crap is anti-white. You can smell it and say it smells good but it is still a big pile of crap


23 posted on 04/20/2014 9:33:17 AM PDT by Altura Ct. (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

We live in “interesting times” this is going to get much more interesting going forward. Pray for guidance.


24 posted on 04/20/2014 9:33:30 AM PDT by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
Has the author included the trillions spent in the War on Poverty?

In 2010, the median black family held around $16,000 in wealth, while the median white family held around $130,000. And this is not just a function of the fact that whites have higher incomes than blacks. Even when you control for income–comparing white and black families in the same income range–white families are three times wealthier than black families. The racial wealth disparities hold up and down the income ladder.

Did they control for single parent households? What is the wealth difference comparing black fatherless households with white fatherless households? How about black two-parent households vs. white two-parent households? But I have a feeling the answers to those questions would not follow Salon's party line that it is all the fault of white racism.

A second cause to investigate is the age of the households. You generally start piling up the household wealth in your fifties and early sixties. If the age of black households skews younger than whites, then you would expect less wealth because of that.

25 posted on 04/20/2014 9:33:53 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Republican amnesty supporters don't care whether their own homes are called mansions or haciendas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

So the trillions of dollars that has been redistributed since the 1964 act is proof that unearned wealth is a sign of a righteous society


26 posted on 04/20/2014 9:34:39 AM PDT by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
we'd still need to address pervasive racial wealth inequality.

factors contributing to pervasive racial wealth inequality:

1. hip hop culture

2. 300 word vocabularies

3. inability to show up for work on time

4. entitlement attitude

5. arm long criminal record

I'm sure that the Obama Administration is all over this issue.

27 posted on 04/20/2014 9:35:23 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
You are putting up a big blinking neon sign which says "REPUBLICANS OPPOSE THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964"

That only helps Obama and the racists.

Please get smarter about how politics works.

28 posted on 04/20/2014 9:35:24 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The “black-sounding” names communicate being raised by a mother on welfare. Being raised without a father we used to call being a bastard, until bastard became too harsh a characterization, and we shifted first to illegitimate and then to love-child and then to normal.


29 posted on 04/20/2014 9:36:15 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Many of these lib/lefty/socialists are in competition to display the most moral superiority as a form of one upmanship. Similar to a male peacock’s superior display of feathers enhances his mating abilities.

This dopey author obviously misses all the wealth redistribution going from whites to blacks and minorities via 0Kare, via various forms of welfare, via affirmative action preferences in education and the work place

BTW check out the lively comments at the source- Salon.com


30 posted on 04/20/2014 9:37:27 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

If it were possible to redistribute wealth 100%, within less than a generation wealth would be accumulated by the same people who possess it now. The originality poor would revert to poverty. It is not unusual for an athlete to make over $100 million during his career and wind up flat broke. It is totally a matter of values. If you come into some money and the first thing you do is head for the nail salon and the dentist for that new gold tooth, you are not going to accumulate anything but stupidity. Asian merchants establish stores in the “food deserts” and by working 16 hours a day seven days a week become wealthy. I suspect that the author of this article could begin by redistributing his own wealth and still live comfortably. He will not because he is a fraud.


31 posted on 04/20/2014 9:38:06 AM PDT by Vehmgericht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime

The real economic damage they're suffering from is the liberal Great Society programs which destroy the black family and discourage self-reliance.

32 posted on 04/20/2014 9:38:53 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

George Orwell — ‘A humanitarian is always a hypocrite’

Orwell on the Hypocrisy of Humanitarians http://othermatters.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/readings-orwell-on-the-hypocrisy-of-humanitarians/


33 posted on 04/20/2014 9:39:25 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

I am getting really tired of this BS being spewed by liberal twats. It will not end well.


34 posted on 04/20/2014 9:39:29 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights Act: We need to redistribute wealth (Yep, he went there)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3144638/posts


35 posted on 04/20/2014 9:40:07 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Why don’t you just run and hide. I don’t give a crap what they say. You want to subject your children, family & community to all this ‘legal’ anti white BS? Just don’t expect others to lay down with you. I refuse to get on my knees all in the name of ‘civil rights’ .


36 posted on 04/20/2014 9:40:15 AM PDT by Altura Ct. (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

We’ve already redistributed $17 trillion since the Great Society. I think we should stop the waste it has been. It’s ruined generations of blacks, destroying the family life that existed before and kept people engaged in useful lives. It is also ruining the nation.


37 posted on 04/20/2014 9:42:38 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

If one wants to improve the situation two things must change. The first is to return to the moral structure black families had before the onset of LBJ’s Great Society. The second thing is to absolutely reject marxist democrat economic policies. Like America, the the real issue is moral not economic.


38 posted on 04/20/2014 9:46:46 AM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

“DEMOCRAT” Jim Crow apartheid regime....fixed it.


39 posted on 04/20/2014 9:48:03 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
reparations photo: Reparations SF69571.jpg
40 posted on 04/20/2014 9:52:09 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson