You just give that your best shot there, Mr. Obama.
Kick that hornet’s nest some more.
Kick it real good.
The states need to stand up to this.
My question is, what talking points are they ,Obama's Militia ,a/k/a the BLM, going to convey to their moles and plants on this forum to demonize the people there, a/l/a Mr. Bundy?
We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that weve set. Weve got to have a civilian national security force thats just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. Barack Hussein Obama, 7/2/2008They dont call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps that we deserve) defense.
The official name is National Civilian Community Corps. I think of it as the NATCCC, or more simply as the NatCs...
How could Americans have been so stupid?
White guilt nurtured over the past 5 or so decades, thats how.
"The president's role in law enforcement rests on the constitutional requirement that the president take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. The president serves as chief executive of what has become a vast law enforcement apparatus. Should assistance be needed, the president can invoke the authority of commander in chief and deploy the armed forces, including units of state militia, to enforce the law."
Presidential law enforcement powers have grown in rough proportion to enlargements in the responsibilities and power of the national government itself. Over the years Congress has added greatly to the law enforcement duties of the president. One dramatic example of this use of presidential power came in 1962, when John F. Kennedy ordered U.S. marshals and regular army troops to quell riots protesting a court order that required the University of Mississippi to integrate its student body by admitting a black student, James Meredith.
It seems that Harry Reid is recklessly instigating further unrest by calling Patriotic Americans "domestic terrorist".....a cheap political ploy to get those who disagree with Mr. Reid to fire the first shot.....Obama can then step in and have the oppressor with draw or.....
5.56mm
According to the Constitution, the above statement is not entirely correct with respect to who, between states and feds, has responsibility to protect the US from invasions. More specifically, consider Clause 3 of Section 10 of Article I.
Article I, Section 10, Clause 3: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded [emphasis added], or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
The problem with the "invader," illegal immigrants in this case, is that they are simply walking across the border instead taking a more aggressive approach to entering the country. The following football video illustrates my point. Keep your eye on the quarterback in the white jersey.
Trick Touchdown American Football
Also, as mentioned in related threads, the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to address immigration issues, the states uniquely having the 10th Amendment-protected power to regulate immigration imo.
If it’s under the control of the federal government, it’s not a militia.
bkmrk
This is why they were so freaked when the constitutional militia showed up at the Bundy ranch. Howdy boys. :-)
And no, these are not US military members, they are alphabet soup "agents." Almost every Federal fiefdom has them now.
Hey, but at least the Palestinians still love him.
Why on Earth are people striving to become American, knowing full well that once they become an American, the US government will fail to protect them ?
The same administration that gives orders to retreat from engaging illegal aliens and drug smugglers gave a shoot to kill order against American Citizens trying to reclaim some cows for a rancher.
And we let him get away with this because we dont have the balls to nail his a## to the wall, why? because he’s black
state dept pub. 7277 freedom from war. this is what he’s doing.
The military can’t be trusted to enforce martial law, they’ll be confined to base practicing “readiness”. If they were armed, they might breakout and go renegade -which would be bad for the China shop swap teams. When somebody shows up wearing a US flag badge they deserve sworn too -it will be a bad day for the local tacti-cool union city cops.
It certainly does look like Obama is planing to uses all theses Domestic agency as a series of armies to impose domestic control.
Not unlike the Armed BLM at the Bundy Ranch. BLM had no business welding armed sounders and guns. If they wanted to arrest Bundy they should have had the justice department do so.
There was absolute no excuse for them confronting the protesters.