Posted on 04/18/2014 11:10:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
“weed infestation”! Surely they can do better than that. If that’s the case then they better get to crack’n because there’s an awful lot of weeds to get rid of. Send ‘em my way. I got lots if weeds that need to be confiscated out of my flowerbeds...
weed infestation! Surely they can do better than that. If thats the case then they better get to crackn because theres an awful lot of weeds to get rid of. Send em my way. I got lots of weeds that need to be confiscated out of my flowerbeds...
Wouldn’t cattle grazing include the removal of weeds?
I’m sure these leftist bureaucrats would demand you stop using reality and logic right this instant!
Thanks for posting the Global Warming part of this. It’s like an insidious virus, worming into every part of the land. And it’s ALL BOGUS.
Please remember that the Supreme Court has reversed more than 150 of earlier Supreme Court decisions on natural law. Is that what you would consider as someone being consistent and reliable in interpreting the Constitution?
The Resolution of 1780, "the federal trust respecting public lands obligated the united States to extinguish both their governmental jurisdiction and their title to land that achieved statehood."
In the Constitutional Convention of 1787, The Charter of Liberty contained these words, "The new Federal Government is an agent serving the states.", "The delegated powers are few and defined", "All powers not listed are retained by the states or the people", "The Resolution of 1780 formed the basis upon which Congress was required to dispose of territorial and public lands", "All laws shall be made by the Congress of the United States". (not agency bureaucrats!)
That should be sufficient for you to determine who all public lands belong to, hint - NOT the Federal Government!
"The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, it's meaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted. it means now". So said the Supreme Court in South Carolina v United States in 1905
Articles of Confederation, Article VI, clause 1 All engagements entered into before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. In Article IX "... no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States."
Formation of a "more perfect union" does not absolve that union of prior engagements, including those obligations establish by the resolution of 1780 and the Articles of Confederation.
Our government system is established by compact, not between the Government and the State Governments but between the States as Sovereign Communities. By James Madison 1821 (This is what make the County Sheriffs the highest law enforcement officer in that County and gives him/her the authority to tell the BLM, the FBI or any other Federal Agency to get out of the County or they will be arrested and jailed.)
What I have written here is but a short piece of the process that the Founder went through to establish our Constitution and system of government.
Please view these videos and see if they don't change your mind about whether or not Cliven Bundy is in the wrong by defying the BLM.
1of3 Stephen Pratt speaking to Sheriffs at WSSA conference
2of3 Stephen Pratt speaking to Sheriffs at WSSA conference
3of3 Stephen Pratt speaking to Sheriffs at WSSA conference
Here's one that shows why the Sheriff of Clark County is duty bound to keep the BLM and all Federal agents from arresting Cliven Bundy.
These tortoises were doing so poorly a veterinarian, Dr. Jarchow, was consulted. He reported all six specimens were suffering from osteoporosis caused by a protein deficiency in their diet. Dr. Jarchow examined five specimens from the same mountains that shared their range with cattle. He reported these specimens were all healthy and well nourished.
The historical record proves conclusively that tortoise thrive when cattle are on the range with them and without cattle grazing they are always malnourished and unhealthy and their numbers plummet.
http://www.vinsuprynowicz.com/?p=80
**WEEDS** in Nevada...?!?!?!!?!
Good God, this is WAY WORSE than I thought...!!!
Ah, using the Climate Change hustle to harass Bundy.
http://www.infowars.com/harry-reid-calls-cliven-bundy-supporters-domestic-terrorists/
Senator Harry Reid (D-Beijing) referred to Bundy supporters as Nothing more than domestic terrorists, adding, I repeat: what happened there was domestic terrorism.
Reid was referring to the stand off on Saturday in Bunkerville where Bundy supporters, some of whom were armed, forced Bureau of Land Management agents to back down and release around 380 head of cattle belonging to Bundy that had been seized over the course of the previous week.
Reid claimed that Bundy viewed the United States as a foreign government, while accusing his supporters of goading violence.
There were hundreds, hundreds of people from around the country that came there, Reid said. They had sniper rifles in the freeway. They had weapons, automatic weapons. They had children lined up. They wanted to make sure they got hurt first What if others tried the same thing?
Despite Reids characterization of Bundy supporters as domestic terrorists, the only violence metered out during the dispute was when BLM agents tasered and assaulted Bundy supporters during an incident on April 9.
No matter where you stand on the Bundy issue, Reids characterization of American protesters as domestic terrorists is chilling and a massive backlash is almost certain to follow.
It also fits the narrative that the federal government has been pushing for years through literature such as the MIAC report, which framed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists. In 2012, a Homeland Security study was leaked which characterized Americans who are suspicious of centralized federal authority, and reverent of individual liberty as extreme right-wing terrorists.
Reid attracted controversy earlier this week when he promised that the BLMs fight with Bundy was not over. The Nevada Senator was hit with accusations of cronyism after his former staffer Neil Kornze was confirmed as the new BLM director earlier this month.
Reid is obviously angry after his complicity in the siege against the Bundy family was exposed and became a viral story. Although many news outlets claimed this issue was debunked, Reids involvement in a solar farm just 35 miles from Bundys ranch is documented. Archived files which were deleted from the BLMs own website confirm that confiscating Bundys cattle was necessary in order to clear the way for lucrative solar deals with transnational corporations.
5.56mm
Gotta protect the weeds by getting rid of the cattle.
“Weed” is a protect crop here in Northern California also. The feds mainly steer clear to protect their lives.
I can't recall an prior instance of a US Senator injecting himself into a federal standoff.
During the Ruby Ridge standoff, the Waco siege, or the showdown with the Montana Freemen, the senators of those states were silent.
We're hearing from Dingy Harry about every day now, and not on the side of his constituents. He must be the driving force behind this, and whenever he opens his yap, it's to whine about armed opposition.
Better late than never on the MSM’s part.
We’ve known this for how many days now???
Just think. All that farting around at Bundy’s ranch by the BLM tripled the flatulence going on in the Nevada desert. That can’t be good for Algore’s ozone layer.
RANCHERS VS THE FED
KELLY AND REPORT BY DENNIS MICHAEL LYNCH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=2Zd2SG6jXdo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8ADdToI9Akw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.