Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie
This one should go in the FR stylebook re how to write coherently  :)

If I'm understanding, you're proposing rescinding the 17th, perhaps altering/creating others, and NOT a total rewrite (which, imho and given the current bell curve, bodes disaster) ?

Not that I'll likely be alive to see any of it happen . . .

7 posted on 04/16/2014 3:10:27 PM PDT by tomkat (3% +1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


and NOT
s/b but NOT

(i think :)

8 posted on 04/16/2014 3:11:41 PM PDT by tomkat (3% +1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tomkat
No total rewrite. Diffuse power back to the states with repeal of the 17th and more.

It occurred to me that when conservatives and rats argue over the constitution, they do not debate the same document.

Because the written constitution is nearly gone, there is little to lose when very angry states, prodded by very angry constituents, push back against the DC tyrants.

16 posted on 04/16/2014 3:27:42 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Change is not made without inconvenience, even from worse to better - Richard Hooker. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson