Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; sickoflibs; GOPsterinMA; Clintonfatigued; justiceseeker93
Ex post facto. Won't stand up in court.

Is it? I'm not a lawyer but if it applies to any official found in contempt of Congress and effects only future pay it seems like it would be perfectly legal to me.

I doubt it will get passed though.

85 posted on 04/20/2014 9:03:54 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Impy
Is it? I'm not a lawyer but if it applies to any official found in contempt of Congress and effects only future pay it seems like it would be perfectly legal to me.

When Holder was found to be in contempt of Congress it was not against the law for him to continue to draw his salary. Now Congress wants to change that. For it to be legal I believe the law would have to say any future contempt of Congress citation would result in loss of pay.

86 posted on 04/21/2014 3:40:43 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: Impy; All
FYI, The ex post facto clause in the Constitution has been held been held by the courts to apply solely to criminal cases and punishments.
88 posted on 04/21/2014 9:16:07 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson