Much as I’d like to side with this guy, and as much as I hate the Fedzillla bullies, he’s frankly a bit of a nutter. He says he would pay the country to graze but not the Feds because they don’t own the land. It’s one thing to say you don’t think the Feds should own most of the state. It’s another thing to say they don’t, refuse to pay grazing royalties, ignore court orders, and bet the family farm (literally) than nobody will enforce them.
Good points. Again, that’s why I asked whether the unpaid fees issue was legit. The Feddies have obviously taken this way too far at this point, and are going to have a hard time backing down (not that they want to). It really has become about more than just grazing rights, for both sides. For private citizens, it’s about having a government that is accountable and respects rights, and for the feddies it’s about enforcing the “agenda” and justifying their militarization.
Don’t think this one has much chance of ending well.
We stand together always, or surely we will fail. Stop accepting legalism as justification for tyranny.
He may be a nutter. But he is my kind of nutter. It takes a nutter to trim the ears of gubment power.