Skip to comments.
George Will: A Recourse to Budgetary Inaction
Tulsa World ^
| 4/10/14
| George Will
Posted on 04/11/2014 1:10:08 PM PDT by JeepersFreepers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: 5thGenTexan; AllAmericanGirl44; Amagi; Art in Idaho; Arthur Wildfire! March; Arthur McGowan; ...
Article V ping. George Will has boarded the train.
2
posted on
04/11/2014 1:12:20 PM PDT
by
Publius
("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
To: JeepersFreepers
3
posted on
04/11/2014 1:13:39 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: Publius
4
posted on
04/11/2014 1:13:55 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
To: Publius
Whoa. That is hugh and series.
5
posted on
04/11/2014 1:16:39 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
( Article V.)
To: Jacquerie
George Will’s involvement means that the Article V movement has gone mainstream.
6
posted on
04/11/2014 1:17:49 PM PDT
by
Publius
("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
To: JeepersFreepers
7
posted on
04/11/2014 1:18:08 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Publius
Absolutely. Will isn't a constitutionalist. How long has he lived within the media DC bubble? Mainstream indeed.
8
posted on
04/11/2014 1:27:50 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
( Article V.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
You got it. George Will call Mark Levin.
Has Levin commented on this Goldwater initiative?
How does it differ from Mark’s proposal?
9
posted on
04/11/2014 1:37:46 PM PDT
by
A'elian' nation
("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
To: Publius; JeepersFreepers
Thank you for the ping.
Someone please tell George Will that it is not a Constitutional Convention, it is a Convention of States (COS) for proposing amendments.
10
posted on
04/11/2014 1:38:34 PM PDT
by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
To: A'elian' nation
It differs in that Will doesnt have to credit Levin for getting the ball rolling.
-PJ
11
posted on
04/11/2014 1:41:10 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: JeepersFreepers
Thanks for the post. This is a very good summary of the proposal and the process.
12
posted on
04/11/2014 1:43:40 PM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
To: Political Junkie Too
Will seems to have left off some research into his article, not the least of which is erroneously calling it a "constitutional convention". Consider:
The compact designates as the sole delegates to the convention the governors of participating states...
This deviates from common practice and then opens up the door to other possibly worse deviances. The Art V COS intention is to utilize state legislatures, and bypass governors. The legislatures typically are closer to the will of the people. Here in MA, both reps and senators (actually, sinators here in MA) are both elected for 2 year terms.
13
posted on
04/11/2014 1:52:17 PM PDT
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: Publius
My first reaction is that this is good, in that GW often surprises me at how moderate (or “Beltway-ish”) he can be.
14
posted on
04/11/2014 1:52:39 PM PDT
by
Baynative
(Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
To: JeepersFreepers
The risk is that you need 2/3rds of the legislatures to use EXACTLY the same language. Having 4 or 5 Red States going using different language defeats the entire effort. Instead of “balanced budget amendment” they should follow the restricted subject approach of Convention of States. Then you could get a bundle of amendments such as proposed by Levin.
15
posted on
04/11/2014 2:13:26 PM PDT
by
SC_Pete
To: Publius
Good. Let’s all board the train - at least 34 states of us.
16
posted on
04/11/2014 2:16:32 PM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: SC_Pete
Agree. The language must be identical.
However, the significance of this column is who wrote it.
I might have to watch a yik-yak show this Sunday if Will is a guest. If he goes on at any length about Article V, it might blow our movement wide open.
17
posted on
04/11/2014 2:45:32 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
( Fivers unite! We have nothing to lose and our freedoms to gain at an Article V state convention.)
To: Jacquerie
Yes, I had long ago given up on Will. I am just wary of the “divide and conquer” trap.
18
posted on
04/11/2014 3:10:21 PM PDT
by
SC_Pete
To: Publius; Jacquerie
As significant as it might be that George Will has boarded the train, it is not insignificant that he fails either to credit or to acknowledge the participation of Mark Levin in the Article V movement. This movement will find itself fighting more than a two front war as it encounters sniping from all sides as the movement proceeds. It is vital that there be coordination early on to avoid offering the Washington establishment any opening to divide and conquer.
As both of you know, Congress will use any discrepancy in the application for convention to discount the applications and refrain from making the "call" for a convention. That is why it is so vital that all applications for a convention be coordinated with identical wording etc.
It appears to me the George Will has gone with the Goldwater Inst.'s version to avoid any apparent connection to Levin who has roughed up George Will considerably of late. Nor is it insignificant that George Will' s approved version appears to be limited to balance budget approach without the structural reforms advanced by Levin and others. To the degree that George Will is a conservative his credentials are largely in the zone of fiscal conservatism.
The Republican as well is the Democrat establishment in Washington would very much like to see these divisions inchoate but embedded in the various state applications to be exploited later.
19
posted on
04/11/2014 10:13:13 PM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: nathanbedford
Curly Howard has(had) more wisdom than George Will...
George is always on the verge of going full moonbat but doesn’t..
He is an intestinal parasite.. in the republican colon...
laying eggs... i.e. part of “the problem”...
20
posted on
04/11/2014 10:27:14 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson