Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

What plans? It is in the middle of nowhere based on the photos. The whole thing is confusing. Does bundy have title to the land or not? Who owns land these cows are grazing on? Were fees owed to feds and county and bundy just paid county?

I wish reporting was a bit more thoroigh on what’s going on.


24 posted on 04/11/2014 2:02:15 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

Water, oil, mineral rights (maybe all promised to the Chinese as collateral on the money we’ve borrowed from them to give to Obama’s peeps).


26 posted on 04/11/2014 2:05:14 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
Does bundy have title to the land or not?

NO! The land in question involves state land that is controlled by the BLM which oversees and makes improvements for the lessees who lease the land.

The BLM stopped performing their paid duties back in 1993 and Bundy continued the grazing of his cows and performed the land enhancements at his own expense..

Rather than pay a federal agency that had stopped performing its duties in an attempt to drive off Bundy, Bundy stopped paying the required fees and was willing to pay Clark County, the real owner of the land......

Clark County chose not to accept those payments and now we have the current problem.......

As a side note, Mr. Bundy is more than willing to pay for the retroactive grazing rights to Clark County but not the BLM........

31 posted on 04/11/2014 2:18:03 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Under Reagan spring always arrived on time.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson