Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saywhatagain
I've read the statutes and Nevada is most certainly an open range state. Livestock owners are not liable for damage caused by livestock unless the aggrieved property owner had a 'legal fence' around his or her property.

Marbury v. Madison gums up the works, again.

Federal courts have ruled that Nevada open range law does not apply to federal land because of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

205 posted on 04/11/2014 1:53:00 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

Thank you for that reference.


226 posted on 04/11/2014 2:09:40 PM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: Scoutmaster
Federal courts have ruled that Nevada open range law does not apply to federal land because of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Except that the supremacy clause is only for things pursuant to the Constitution itself — in all other cases it is legal nullity [as affirmed by the 9th and 10th Amendments]. Therefore, just because the government says [e.g.] drugs are illegal, does not make drugs illegal — indeed, the Constitution had to be amended in order to make it possible for the federal government to make alcohol illegal.

347 posted on 04/11/2014 10:33:55 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson