To: IYAS9YAS
My understanding was that in the 90s, they reduced the amount of AUMs allowed (from 1,000 to 150 is a number I've seen thrown about around here, but no official source).If you read my original post, I was asking questions about the situation. I just mentioned the cost going up along with others. You have just named another, where they appear to be reducing his income by as much as 85%.
152 posted on
04/11/2014 12:54:26 PM PDT by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck
If you read my original post, I was asking questions about the situation. I just mentioned the cost going up along with others. You have just named another, where they appear to be reducing his income by as much as 85%.I have yet to find a firm source, other than what's been posted around here.
181 posted on
04/11/2014 1:17:13 PM PDT by
IYAS9YAS
(Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson